Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

17 of Trump’s judicial picks move closer to confirmation
The Washington Times ^ | January 18, 2018 | Alex Swoyer

Posted on 01/18/2018 10:57:26 AM PST by jazusamo

Seventeen of President Trump’s federal court nominees cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday, setting them up for floor votes as Republicans look to install as many conservative judges as possible.

Eight of the judges were deemed very controversial and were approved on a 11-10 party-line votes, while just two were approved unanimously.

Three of the judges were for circuit courts.

Democrats raised concerns over several of the nominees over their LGBTQ positions, saying they would not be fair to that community.

But Democrats spent the most time protesting Thomas Alvin Farr, who was nominated to be a district judge for the Eastern District of North Carolina. Mr. Farr was one of the judges receiving a party-line vote.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: judges; judicialcommittee; judicialnominees; maga; trump; ussenate; winning
Good! If Cory Booker and Kamala Harris are against Thomas Alvin Farr it just shows what an excellent federal judge he will be.
1 posted on 01/18/2018 10:57:26 AM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“Democrats no likey” means “MAGA”


2 posted on 01/18/2018 11:00:03 AM PST by HombreSecreto (They never thought that she would lose - God had other plans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
two were approved unanimously

We better take another look at them.
3 posted on 01/18/2018 11:01:13 AM PST by JoSixChip (Repeal and replace the gopE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Stick that sword in and break it off!!


4 posted on 01/18/2018 11:02:29 AM PST by raiderboy ( "...if we have to close down our government, weÂ’re building that wall" DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

p


5 posted on 01/18/2018 11:04:02 AM PST by bitt (We donÂ’t need an electric chair, we need electric bleachers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

Bad, bad sign, indeed!


6 posted on 01/18/2018 11:07:04 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

“”””Eight of the judges were deemed very controversial and were approved on a 11-10 party-line votes, while just two were approved unanimously.”””””

Very controversial? Sure, if you say so.


7 posted on 01/18/2018 11:20:08 AM PST by shelterguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
saying they would not be fair to that community.

How do they know? This appears to be their bigotry and prejudice showing. How uninclusive of them.

8 posted on 01/18/2018 11:20:54 AM PST by rjsimmon (The Tree of Liberty Thirsts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

MAGA!

Support Free Republic, Folks!

Please bump the Freepathon or click above to donate or become a monthly donor!

9 posted on 01/18/2018 11:25:49 AM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
"Eight of the judges were deemed very controversial and were approved on a 11-10 party-line votes..."

"11-to-10" out of committee is how I want all the nominations to pass...

"...two were approved unanimously...

I'm suspicious of these "unanimous" ones...Is the next Roberts among them??

10 posted on 01/18/2018 12:05:45 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

Amen.

Roberts fell off the ship.


11 posted on 01/18/2018 12:30:16 PM PST by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Are any of these guys replacing any in the 5th and 9th Circuit? Those commie judges should be tarred and feathered.


12 posted on 01/18/2018 12:34:17 PM PST by beergarden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Very controversial? That’s good news to me. I hope Trump appoints 1,000 “very controversial” judges becfore he leaves office.


13 posted on 01/18/2018 12:35:14 PM PST by beergarden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Congressional Democrats all prefer criminal liberals to honest conservatives. That’s their policy.


14 posted on 01/18/2018 2:14:14 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Sounds like Farr will do JUST GREAT on the Supreme Court!


15 posted on 01/19/2018 5:26:40 PM PST by BobL (I used to own a truck - but I couldn't handle the lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Bump!


16 posted on 01/19/2018 5:33:19 PM PST by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Keep Free Republic Up and Running?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson