Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fhios
I’m no environmentalist but it seems odd that Florida would be a state producing oil. It’s not known for its oil and it’s seasonally unstable and it’s big draw are the lush beaches on the west coast and east coast.

South Carolina, Georgia, and California can say the same thing. Should they be excluded as well?

6 posted on 01/11/2018 3:50:17 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

No, they are not the same thing. *phone hangs up*


7 posted on 01/11/2018 3:52:39 AM PST by Fhios
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

It’s always a cost/benefit analysis. Which grade oil, how much will it cost to get it, refine it, to sell it where for how much. There’s a time the nation might need whatever the east coast could bring, but it’s not now. If we’re talking nat gas, however, that’s a different kettle of fish.


9 posted on 01/11/2018 4:02:43 AM PST by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson