The Wise Guys

Fox News ^ | January 7. 2018 | Vanity

[yetidog]

Interesting new program from Fox.

[sparklite2]

Diddle-Gate, mostly.

[JudyinCanada]

All white men. That’s great - they’re giving a voice to a much discriminated against group! A persecuted minority.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

Wait a minute, why are all you people watching that and not the Golden globe awards? It's that time of the year when we are all learned on politics from our celebrity teachers. For example, I had no idea poverty was sexist, did you?

[laplata]

They’re all conversing? No two or three people talking at the same time, loud annoying voices?

>><<

They had conversations with very, very little talking at the same time and absolutely no raised voices. You will enjoy it.

[acapesket]

EEEw. What IS THAT?

[morphing libertarian]

so give your money away and equalize everything

[fieldmarshaldj]

Connie Britton, an old Massachusetts Communist hag who moved here to Nashville to film the same-named show and decided to enlighten us deplorables on our-wrong thinking politics.

[McGavin999]

It’s really good. Very casual conversation you feel like you are sitting at the table with some really smart guys!

[Aria]

We also like it - is this the beginning of a series?

[McGavin999]

I sure hope so. Conversation is missing lately and this was a very pleasant evening of conversation

[xrmusn]

EEEw. What IS THAT?
= = = = = = = =

Golden Globes....(Titillation?)

My 1940-50 go arounds with the nuns (sort of) remind me that Golden Globes is a good title when you take into consideration the ‘self enhancement’ of some young ladies to further their career

[acapesket]

That be be a fag/hag eeeew. Mine Eyes!

[libstripper]

Good flick in 3D.

[libstripper]

The big problem with Tucker’s snow is he runs a Certified Left Wing Nut Farm.

[jackibutterfly]

"Steve Wynne must have the same plastic surgeon as Wayne Newton."

Is THAT what's wrong with his face?? I wondered why his face was all red.

[Rembrandt]

“It won’t be long before the screaming starts though-——all white men.:-)”

That’s a fair point. What I noticed and really liked was the absence of balance, no shrill, argumentative cockroach from under the left edge of the carpet. I think they would do well to invite visitors, e.g., Walter Williams, Clarence Thomas, Charles Krauthammer, etc. to enliven the conversations.

Still, I thought it was great and a nice surprise even though I was looking forward to Tucker Carlson.

[Jane Long]

I noticed that, as well, about Laura’s show this week. Better.

[Jane Long]

Great idea and suggestions on invitees!

I’d add Rush to that list. I’ve always wanted to sit or listen in, on one his conversations with his cohorts.

We missed the airing but have it set to record when it comes on, again, late.

[Mears]

No Tucker on Sunday night. :-)

The holidays mess up our calendars,don’t they?

.

[alexander_busek]

For example, I had no idea poverty was sexist, did you?

As Tucker Carlson would say, "What does that even mean?!"

Is a poor person automatically sexist?

Are differences in income sexist?

Is a rich person automatically sexist?

Is wealth also sexist?

A person who is not sexist is not responsible for poverty?

(Probably should say: "Sexism leads invariably to poverty," or "Poor people are poor because rich people are sexist and the sexism of rich people results in the poverty of poor people," but I guess that wouldn't be as catchy - though it would at least be susceptible to reasoned discussion - i.e., it is at least falsifiable and is thus provable or refutable.)

Regards,