uh.....because it is too dangerous to the liberal narrative to expose the tool they’ve invented to control population growth, industry, freedom, capitalism, etc.
“uh.....because it is too dangerous to the liberal narrative to expose the tool they’ve invented to control population growth, industry, freedom, capitalism, etc.”
The interesting thing is, without a population in the billions we wouldn’t have many of the things we enjoy so cheaply. Cell phones, cheap as dirt TV’s, even wide availability of the things done by satellites. Oh, and money. Lots and lots of money. That huge population is the driver of our economies. Take away the half of people that liberals talk about, “wouldn’t it be nice if half the people died?” and suddenly the world would be a poorer place with less technology, fewer markets and, ironically, probably more starvation and misery.
As an aside, look at how disastrous the one child per family policy has been for China. It’s like universal sanitation, which gave us polio. Some things sound wonderful on the surface. But, once implemented, there turns out to be a dark side.
Imagine some huge global warming project, which not only impoverishes and starves the world, but goes into effect just as the planet enters another solar minimum and what would have been a mere 200 year cooling period. Well, imagine what the 200 years would turn into if that project “worked.”
Nothing in the world is linear. We simply can’t look at the situation as it is now and make an accurate projection of what it would be if we interfered. So, liberals saved the spotted owls by destroying the lumber industry. Now they are being wiped out by a different breed of owl. Nothing men do will come out as men think it will.
As a friend of mine is fond of saying, “Some things are so stupid, only a college professor would believe them.”