Posted on 12/23/2017 4:23:39 PM PST by GoldenState_Rose
A group of Russian scientists have sounded the alarm over what they said were attempts by the head of the security service to openly justify Stalin’s mass purges, the first such attempt in decades.
In an open letter published by Kommersant broadsheet, more than 30 academics slammed Alexander Bortnikov, the head of the FSB security service – the successor to the feared KGB – for seeking to legitimise the mass purges known as the Great Terror.
Historians estimate about one million people perished in Stalin’s purges in the 1930s out of around 20 million who died under his three-decade rule before his death in 1953.
In an interview with Russian government newspaper Rossiiskaya Gazeta published this week Bortnikov said the archives show that “a significant part” of the criminal cases of that period “had an objective side to them”.
He said he did not want to “whitewash anyone” but pointed to “links of coup plotters to foreign security agencies”.
The interview was published to mark 100 years since the establishment of the Cheka, the Soviet Union’s first secret police service, created to stamp out opposition to Bolshevik rule.
President Vladimir Putin – himself a former KGB officer – will run for a fourth Kremlin term in a March presidential election in a move expected to extend his rule until 2024 and cement his status as the longest-serving Russian leader since Stalin.
Many liberals have expressed concern that the Kremlin will tighten the screws on civil society even further following Putin’s expected re-election.
In their open letter, the Russian scientists expressed fears that the “revision” of the role of the Soviet-era secret police could be intentional and called on the general public to join their protest.
“Apparently for the first time since the 20th Congress of the Communist Party held in 1956 one of the top functionaries of our state justifies mass purges of the 1930s-1940s which were accompanied by wrongful sentences, torture and executions of hundreds of thousands of innocent compatriots,” they said in the letter.
Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev used a secret session of the 20th Congress of the Communist Party to denounce the horrors of Stalin’s rule.
The letter said that Bortnikov had failed to denounce the arrest or murder of millions of Soviet people including scientists and senior army commanders.
“The goal of Mr Bortnikov’s wide-ranging interview is not clear to us,” said the letter published on the website of the respected newspaper late Friday.
“What is it? A recommendation to a new president? Nostalgia for bygone times or the propaganda of a new doctrine?” the letter added.
“In any case we firmly protest the revision of perceptions about the inhuman and anti-popular nature of the purges and call on all sensible people – who do not wish upon their children to relive the horrors of the 1930s – to join our protest.”
Is that from Yalta?! Well strategic expediency in World War II did not trump the bigger moral picture in the end. Cold War began the moment WWII ended. Truman was pres by then.
Stalin’s influence over FDR pre-dated America’s entry into the war.
I think most people realize that Stalin was working with Hitler, until the need for more economic stimulation from military spending, to put an end to the “great depression”, brought the catalyst for the war between Russia and Germany.
And Stalin was more than happy to let Hitler take care of Stalin’s Jewish Problem before the Russians kicked the Nazis out.
In fact, Stalin probably figured losing 20 million Soviet citizens would be better in the long-run for the country.
And as you can see from the other pic (taken at the home of a prominent Democrat) the Democrat Party’s affection for Stalin continues to this day.
28,000,000, many through starvation and disease, was the last figure I saw, and that is what the Soviet Union would admit to.
In fact, the reason that Ukraine had The Crimea in the first place was because Khrushchev wanted to win them over, to give him leverage in his bid for power.
Stalin: “Hey, Frank, how many right-wingers and Jews does it take to screw in a light bulb ?”
FDR: “I dunno, Joe. How many ?”
Stalin: “How should I know ? I had them all killed !”
This forum needs all the truth it can get.
Do you mean socialist sympathies with regard to New Deal and economics?
Ah, the Soviets were not interested in saving capitalism.
1. The ‘revival’ of ‘nostalgia’ is a way to poach leftist supporters by the ruling party and when it comes to WW2 it is also a vehicle to stroke patriotism to which is not than much examples in more recent Russian history.
2. Bortnikov in his statement is factually correct although his wording could be better. NKVD in 1930s was a single federalized Soviet law enforcement body. I than sense they brought to justice more pickpocketers and rapist that they did dissidents.
A ‘purge’ isn’t necessarily what is bad. The key is to purge the right kind. Purging is a simple political tool since humans first organized politically. You can’t eliminate human nature. Just make sure you are doing the purging and not being purged youself.
Stalin and the Betrayal of Leningrad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEIlXvlvXMA
The fact is, Stalin despised the City of Leningrad, and the threat its’ leaders posed to his leadership, and secretly hoped the Nazis would destroy the city.
Harry Hopkins was a Soviet asset. He helped FDR concoct the heinous “New Deal” expansion of government’s grip over the American people. He was a close “advisor” to FDR up until the end.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.