As long as our society allows women to decide long after the event if an interaction with a man was flirtatious or assault (there’s now no difference between the two other than the woman’s openness in receiving it), they can control men’s careers and earning capacities. I’m not exaggerating. Fortunately, most women still understand that men will pursue and provoke and it is the woman’s job to instantly correct anything she deems out of line, not 40 years after the fact.
The problem is that the recent slew of judgements against men combines both the harmless and the truly harmful then condemns them equally with a broad brush and no context.
As long as women are allowed to define where the line is drawn led by extreme feminists, these “zeta males” may become a major group. But it doesn’t end there. Who, then, gets to act out their male aggressiveness without fear of reprisal? Why, the homosexual, of course. They can easily turn rejecting homosexual advances into hate crimes the same way women can turn rejected sexual advances into real crimes.
while the victims are somewhat scattershot at this point, the eventual goal of liberalism is to eliminate white heterosexual men, especially Christians. It’s working splendidly on government campuses and takes place under the guise of tolerance and diversity.
What ever happened to the good, old fashioned face slap (or harridan scream, depending on the contact)? These are faster ways to stop the average attempt at sexual harassment!