That’s a lot of yelping to cover a basic logic error. Also so equivocation, as you justify the Russian election interference narrative immediately after dramatically harrumphing ABSOLUTELY NOT. Do you understand the meaning of the word “absolute?” It doesn’t appear as if you do.
Re Logic. I said that Putin may have lit a match that started the forest fires of “Collusion” as a disinformation operation.
One you light the fire, you leave without leaving any fingerprints, match sticks, or other signs that you were there.
If you knew anything about Soviet disinformation ops, or even some of their “gray” ops, then you would know exactly what I’m talking about.
If there were coordinated but widespread Russian hacker attempts, or more likely just attention getting probes made to look like a major cyberattack on the election processes, then they were the equivalent of lighting the initial leaves on fire in a forest. Then the cyberists disappeared just enough for a few of them to be traced to the old Soviet bloc. How convenient!
The Democrats and their puppet media just threw gasoline on the small fire in order to make it into just what Putin wanted, a great “Collusion Conflagration” and the subsequent attacks on Donald Trump.
That is one alternative to explain some of the Russian activities that smell like some good old KGB operations during previous US elections starting at least in 1964. See the Soviet bloc propaganda they put out about Goldwater and nuclear weapons and you’ll know what I mean.