Actually, it is not too late, if Moore decides to run again for the seat in the 2018 election. If he chooses to do so, however, he must make several important additions to his campaign.
1) Just before the election, the state supreme court, no friend of his, permitted counties to destroy their electronic records after the election. This means those records, along with what could be evidence of copious amounts of voter fraud, will be lost. So the Republican party and legislature in Alabama need to be lobbied *hard* to pass a retention law of county election data.
2) Reports of widespread voter fraud did happen, and there needs to be some means of countering it. This means clearing the voter rolls of ineligible voters, large numbers of poll watchers, and quick response teams when reports come in of possible voter fraud.
3) He does need to sue each of his accusers, starting with the most obviously fraudulent, importantly in the *lowest* possible court. He doesn’t need to win a lot of cash, but to get a quick judgment against them in court. It also gives his lawyers the right of “discovery”, to see if the accusers were paid off, and by whom.
4) President Trump needs to direct the RNC to give Moore their “full faith and credit”, to not support any primary challenger against him, and to give him campaign money.
>>>Actually, it is not too late, if Moore decides to run again for the seat in the 2018 election.
The seat does not come open again until 2020.
>>>1) Just before the election, the state supreme court, no friend of his, permitted counties to destroy their electronic records after the election. This means those records, along with what could be evidence of copious amounts of voter fraud, will be lost. So the Republican party and legislature in Alabama need to be lobbied *hard* to pass a retention law of county election data.
The court, at the request of the Republican Secretary of State, said that counties did not have to retain digital images of the paper ballots that were submitted. The paper ballots are retained for 22 months. What evidence of fraud would be included in those images that wod not be apparent in the actual paper ballot?
>>>2) Reports of widespread voter fraud did happen, and there needs to be some means of countering it.
Lots of reports on the internet, but we never seem to every see any actual evidence. In this day of cell phones, where are the pictures and videos of the buses carrying voters from one polling place to another?
For years, we’ve argued for voter ID to prevent fraud. Is the argument now that voter ID doesn’t work?