Skip to comments.
U.S. judge orders special counsel to turn over evidence on Michael Flynn
Reuters
| 12/13/2017
| Sarah Lynch
Posted on 12/13/2017 3:51:30 PM PST by advance_copy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
The order by the judge is considered routine, and the government by law is required to turn over such information to the defense if it exists.
My understanding is such a "Brady order" isn't routine when the defendant has entered a guilty plea. This is a very big deal as the Judge's order should mean Mueller has to turn over any evidence of bias among his investigators. Based on hearings today and earlier, there's evidence of bias aplenty.
To: advance_copy
2
posted on
12/13/2017 3:53:21 PM PST
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life or nothing at all)
To: advance_copy
I read the order. It contained boilerplate language. I don’t think that negates your point. Even with boilerplate language, how often are Brady orders issued in cases where there is a guilty plea?
3
posted on
12/13/2017 3:55:12 PM PST
by
SSS Two
To: advance_copy
The rats circle the wagons to defend their lowest allies. OTOH, senior pubbies scatter like cats. Eff ‘em all.
4
posted on
12/13/2017 3:57:35 PM PST
by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
To: SSS Two
Well he already pleaded guilty so Brady info usually is immaterial?
5
posted on
12/13/2017 3:59:06 PM PST
by
Williams
(Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
To: SSS Two
All material covered under Brady is to be provided to the Defendant BEFORE they plead guilty. Judge just making sure they are hiding any loose ends. This is the current problem in the Bundy Cases and the Twin Peaks Cases.
6
posted on
12/13/2017 3:59:52 PM PST
by
DrDude
(Why allow Hillary to continue to breath!)
To: advance_copy
The entire Mueller affair is sickening and disgusting. General Flynn should never have been indicted let alone entrapped.
7
posted on
12/13/2017 4:00:27 PM PST
by
Hostage
(Article V)
To: advance_copy
Your understanding matches my understanding.
8
posted on
12/13/2017 4:02:26 PM PST
by
piytar
(http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
To: DrDude
Yes. And my inderstanding also is if they didnt, its grounds to undo the plea.
9
posted on
12/13/2017 4:03:56 PM PST
by
piytar
(http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
To: advance_copy
No way Mueller will turn over any material that is helpful to Flynn - that would take integrity, which Mueller does not possess.
To: advance_copy
I’d love to see this judge boot Flynn free and make a referral for Mueller.
11
posted on
12/13/2017 4:07:02 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(This forum is a Doug Jones free zone! Go Roy Moore!)
To: advance_copy
You do not talk to the FBI. EVER. Not without a lawyer. Not with a lawyer. NEVER for any reason do you talk to the FBI. They are not your friends. They are not here to help you. They are not to be trusted in any regard. None of them. Not one!
12
posted on
12/13/2017 4:09:25 PM PST
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: Jim from C-Town
To: advance_copy
If a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or nolo contendere is made before sentence is imposed, the court may permit the plea to be withdrawn if the defendant shows any fair and just reason. At any later time, a plea may be set aside only on direct appeal or by motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
With Strzok interviewing Flynn Strzok would have a conflict of interest in the case based on his temperament revealed in his text messaging.
14
posted on
12/13/2017 4:13:34 PM PST
by
Flick Lives
(The FBI is a corrupt partisan organization)
To: piytar
Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine evidence has been met. This judge is about to stick his own ass in a crack if he doesn’t acknowledge that.
15
posted on
12/13/2017 4:15:29 PM PST
by
txhurl
(Banana Republicans, as far as the eye can see)
To: advance_copy
President Trump tweeted a few months ago that Mueller would be done by Christmas. We can always hope that this was envisioned.
To: advance_copy
Always keep in mind that the original judge in the case had to recuse before sentencing because he was also a FISA court judge.
17
posted on
12/13/2017 4:31:01 PM PST
by
pnut22
To: advance_copy
This is the judge that Dick Morris was talking about in his video yesterday.
18
posted on
12/13/2017 4:31:46 PM PST
by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: advance_copy
It’s only routine to a righteous judge like the Honorable Emmitt Sullivan. Thank you Lord, that the lot fell on him.
To: SSS Two
Turn over to whom? The court?
20
posted on
12/13/2017 4:35:19 PM PST
by
RitaOK
(Viva Christo Rey! Public education & academia= the farm team for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson