[Mastador1]

It would have been nice to have some more info in the article like why did it feelwas it discriminated against, or was it a just because suit, and why did the USSC reject the case.

[Hebrews 11:6]

It would have been nice to have some more info in the article like...why did the USSC reject the case.

An impossible request. The USSC accepts a case (grants certiorari) when four or more justices vote to do so, and frustratingly it never, ever explains why when fewer than four so vote. However, very rarely a Justice will post a written dissent from the decision not to grant certiorari, and he may include his (biased) view of the majority's rationale. That dissent, if any, will be posted here; in this case, none has yet done so.