However we can get hung up on words here. She “altered” the document and to many this clasifies what she did as a forgery.
But she also is lying about when she did it. I hope we will eventually learn that the addition was not done until Allred explained that to be useful, the note would have to have elements that clearly implicated Roy Moore (simply the first name would not do) and would have to tie him to the restaurant and the date when she would be under age. (the added notes do this nicely but the “DA” confuses things until we learn that that is how Roy Moore’s assistant initialed off when she used a signature stamp. This stamp was used on the signature of the divorce settlement many years later. I doubt that Moore actually signed his name like the stamp back when he was 32.
“ (the added notes do this nicely but the “DA” confuses things until we learn that that is how Roy Moore’s assistant initialed off when she used a signature stamp.”
Not Important WHY she added the DA, rather doing so alters the signature, making what may have been legitimate, a forgery. It’s why they are dancing around that minor detail.