The concept of a Senate ethics committee can be somewhat surreal when one considers the cases of calling for the head of a Senate candidate accused of creeping 16 and 17 year olds 35 years before his race for the Senate vs a seated married Senator on the way to a physical “liason” drunkenly driving off a bridge leaving a female staffer in his car to drown while fleeing the scene of the accident.There is no equivalency between the two. However I don’t even think there was an ethics investigation of the latter.Indeed Dems reelected the latter Senator to 7 more terms and was a serious centender for the Dem Presidential nomination.I guess the concept of moral turpitude has a different set of metrics in the Democrat political wonderland than the real world.
You do remember that they openly rejected Christ at their last convention right?