cont
When Bill Clinton was at the height of the Monica Lewinsky sex scandal, Hollywood was by his side, offering donations for his legal fees, and one significant donor was a man who is now going through his own sex scandal—Harvey Weinstein.
Billionaire Harvey Weinstein raised $1,422,683 for federal candidates and political entities between 1990-2016. That’s small potatoes for his 27 years of rank Democratism, sucking up to feminism and upholding so-called abortion rights as he rampaged and assaulted young women. Adds up to about $5300 a year. Something tells me there are a lot of cash payments off-the-record being paid. (hat tip outpostinmass2)
Crunching the numbers as outpost did does give us a sharper look at the political money game as played by the conniving Clintons.
Harvey also gave a bundle to the nefarious tax-exempt Clinton Foundation and perhaps to offshoots of the Clintons tax-free entities.
Did Harvey’s donations to the C/F go to “do-good projects”? Or did they make a circuitous route? Maybe landing back into the Clintons eternal political scams?
<><> How did the Hollyood elite list payments to Clinton’s sex defense fund on their tax returns?
<><>How did the “DreamWorks” trio, Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg, list their 60,000 dollars to Clinton’s sex defense fund?
<><>How did BET list its contribution to Clinton on its corporate statements?
<><> Did Harvey’s company list these payments as “business expenses?”
The biggie is the tax element.
<><> Did donors deduct it as a “business expense”,
<><> was it included in assets, payments listed on organization balance sheets as a “liability?”
<><> Did Clinton document it as “income”?
<><> Were the donors given a tax-free certificate from the Clinton Foundation?
Looking at the donation disclosure page of a high profile donor, on immediately noticed maxed out contributions by spouses and children on nearly the same day. Well, okay, what's wrong with that, isn't that normal?
Mining deeper however also reveals that throngs of employees also maxed out at the same time. Oh, must have been a fund raiser, eh. Well , when a raging bully such as Weinstein “suggests” thru various in-house cutouts that one’s career might suffer absent theses contributions. At some point only the new staff on board need to be told.
Thus the seemingly paltry direct max contribution is multiplied ten fold and more. What are not easy to indentify or quantify are the donations of ancillary connections, the sub-contractors whose livelihood depend on the “beneficence” of the big fish. Little Tammany Halls not visible to the public.