Posted on 11/26/2017 4:50:22 AM PST by reaganaut1
WASHINGTON — On its face, the notice sent to 248 county election officials asked only that they do what Congress has ordered: Prune their rolls of voters who have died, moved or lost their eligibility — or face a federal lawsuit.
The notice, delivered in September by a conservative advocacy group, is at the heart of an increasingly bitter argument over the seemingly mundane task of keeping accurate lists of voters — an issue that will be a marquee argument before the Supreme Court in January.
At a time when gaming the rules of elections has become standard political strategy, the task raises a high-stakes question: Is scrubbing ineligible voters from the rolls worth the effort if it means mistakenly bumping legitimate voters as well?
The political ramifications are as close as a history book. Florida’s Legislature ordered the voter rolls scrubbed of dead registrants and ineligible felons before the 2000 presidential election. The resulting purge, based on a broad name-matching exercise, misidentified thousands of legitimate voters as criminals, and prevented at least 1,100 of them — some say thousands more — from casting ballots.
That was the election in which George W. Bush’s 537-vote margin in Florida secured his place in the White House. Controlling the rules of elections — including who is on or off the rolls — has been both a crucial part of political strategy and a legal battleground ever since.
Conservative groups and Republican election officials in some states say the poorly maintained rolls invite fraud and meddling by hackers, sap public confidence in elections and make election workers’ jobs harder. Voting rights advocates and most Democratic election officials, in turn, say that the benefits are mostly imaginary, and that the purges are intended to reduce the number of minority, poor and young voters
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Fake argument. False premise that is used because it is the only viable opposition to doing the right thing-cleaning up the voter rolls.
Yeah. Sure. Felons, illegal aliens, bussed around voters, multi state voters. All welcome to the New York Slimes
Should have turned the task over to Foundation for Freedom From Religion. Officials everywhere melt at the thought of receiving a letter on their desk.
Funny. Now when I see an article from WaPo or the NYTimes I automatically invert whatever angle they’re pushing. If they say it’s “bad” it’s “good”. I simply mirror-read whatever they’re spouting.
The real reason NYS hates ID: We’ve been losing House seats for decades. We’re down from 40+ House districts in the 1940s to 27 now. We lost 2 after the 2010 census. Rumor is we’re gonna lose 1 to 2 more after the next. NYS is bleeding taxpayers, jobs, and House seats. Which is why accurate voter rolls are the LAST thing the uniparty wants.
Ignoring, of course, the thousands of military votes in Florida that were systematically discarded by the Left which would have given Bush a wider margin. So, which group has the more legitimate complaint - the one who wanted felons and illegals to have their votes counted or the one who wanted to have the people defending our country to have their votes counted?
democrats want as many felons, dead people, and illegals voting for them as possible, because it’s the only way they can win elections.
It’s additionally fake because every one of those people you have had their name purged in error can vote CONDITIONALLY.
After they are declared eligible, their vote will be then counted. It is a false argument.
Absolutely.
The legitimate voters were able to prove their eligibility to vote previously, and can do it again.
The illegitimate voters who were never able to prove their eligibility still cannot do that.
It all works out.
One thing they could do is send a new voter registration card to each registered voter
each two year election cycle. All returned cards are removed or a hold placed on the
registrant until cleared up.
Fake argument. False premise that is used because it is the only viable opposition to doing the right thing-cleaning up the voter rolls.
They ignore reality when it suits them. A common thing to do, but very dangerous when they control so much media.
it was the NYT’s that was a major party in analyzing the Florida election to determine who would have won had the vote recount been conducted. They determined it would still have been Bush. So now they are promoting a different slant.
YES. If done in a timely manner, erroneously scrubbed eligible voters can re-register. And "mistakenly" will most of the time be due to failure on the part of the voter to maintain their information properly. Furthermore, there are provisional ballots available and these "disenfranchised" voters can still vote and be counted. All of which yields a much more accurate election.
On the other hand, if deceased or relocated voters remain on the rolls, the probability of voter fraud, WHICH HAS OCCURRED, is increased.
Yep - plus it ain't that hard to prove voter eligibility if you happen to be one of the minuscule number that shouldn't have been purged....they act as if being dropped means one never gets to vote again.
Bad news for the Democrats!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.