RE: No proof he did. No proof he didn’t.
So, by America’s laws, what should the presumption be?
40 years have passed and where’s the proof?
Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
Well in the first place, this isn't going to go to court. If McConnell carries out his threat then when Moore gets sworn in he'll go straight to the ethics committee. Criminal proceedings don't come into play there. Put these women before the committee, under oath, repeating their stories and unless Moore has something to refute their testimony then who do you think the committee will believe? And Moore doesn't have evidence, other than possibly against that wack-doodle and her year book that Allred dredged up.
Like I said, no evidence for and no evidence against. Just testimony.
Actually, in many areas accusations like this place the accused under the presumption of guilt till proven innocent. And even then, it is often viewed as “He got away with it”.
Which is many such things used to have a statue of limitations.
That America ended a long time ago.