Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: manc

Someone here pointed out that she did not ask Moore to recuse in her divorce. Tell tale sign she is lying...

Unless she tried to blackmail him for favoritism


23 posted on 11/17/2017 8:14:50 AM PST by RummyChick (I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

>>>Someone here pointed out that she did not ask Moore to recuse in her divorce. Tell tale sign she is lying...

There was never an actual hearing in the case. All of the initial documents were signed by a different district judge, W. D. Russell. On May 25, 1999, Judge Russell scheduled the first hearing for the case for June 16.

But that hearing never took place. In June, before the scheduled hearing was set to take place, she filed for a motion to “continue” (delay) the hearing because she and her husband “are going to counseling and are attempting to reconcile.”

A month later, she filed a motion to dismiss the case. That is the document Moore signed, and given there was no hearing, there is no reason the divorce action would have required her to enter the courthouse or have contact with Moore.


42 posted on 11/17/2017 8:30:13 AM PST by oincobx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson