Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fella

“Conservatives in positions of power should not act like progressives. She has a protected right to express her opinions.”

Perhaps, but I don’t believe she has the right to display profanity like that. I would think (hope) that there were at least local ordinances prohibiting this kind of thing. Who wants their kid reading that in traffic?


12 posted on 11/17/2017 5:28:58 AM PST by bk1000 (I stand with Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: bk1000

The F-word is all over cable TV, popular music and street language to the extent that it has become common usage.


23 posted on 11/17/2017 5:54:55 AM PST by fella ("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bk1000; fella
“Conservatives in positions of power should not act like progressives. She has a protected right to express her opinions.”

Perhaps, but I don’t believe she has the right to display profanity like that. I would think (hope) that there were at least local ordinances prohibiting this kind of thing. Who wants their kid reading that in traffic?


That's the point with me. She can have a bumper sticker that says "I hate Trump! - and I hate you for voting for him!" but I draw the line at profanity.

There was an old Soviet Union joke. I think Reagan told it once:

Q: American: "Is it true that there is freedom of speech in the Soviet Union, just like in the USA?"

A: Soviet: "In principle, yes. In the USA, you can stand in front of the White House in Washington, DC, and yell, "Down with Reagan!", and you will not be punished. Equally, you can also stand in Red Square in Moscow and yell, "Down with Reagan!", and you will not be punished."


26 posted on 11/17/2017 5:56:56 AM PST by COBOL2Java (John McCain treats GOP voters like he treated his first wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: bk1000
SCOTUS ruled in the 70’s that obscenity laws couldn't be used to suppress protest, I believe it was a case about someone wearing a shirt that said F the war or something similar.

I think this sticker crosses the line; the top part is distasteful, but protected. The bottom part is directed generally, and I sincerely doubt would be found to be protected.

The ACLU seems eager to take on the case however if someone brings charges. Since I think they'll lose, bring it.

32 posted on 11/17/2017 6:16:06 AM PST by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson