To: ClearBlueSky
"Well, there is-and should be- anger at people using handicapped spots when theyre not entitled. Happens a lot. What concerns me most is the fact that the daughter was conceived AFTER the woman was diagnosed with MS. Im sorry, thats not only selfish- its insane. Not only will your child have a handicapped mother, she will have to worry that she inherited the disease. I just dont understand people who choose to do this to their children. Before a diagnosis is one thing-intentional reproduction afterward is- IMO-the height of arrogant selfishness."
You are really sick.
42 posted on
11/16/2017 7:30:15 AM PST by
KeyLargo
To: KeyLargo
I’ve never seen so many posts by busybodies on one thread. Is it anger? Is it envy? or maybe some people never got to be a hall monitor in elementary school. Imagine being upset that a disabled person had a baby !
52 posted on
11/16/2017 7:46:13 AM PST by
ladyjane
To: KeyLargo
Interesting. You equate the idea of people who have been diagnosed with a debilitating and inherited disease NOT choosing to create children who will suffer along with them(and suffer the mental worry of inheriting said disease) with DEATH PANELS?? If anyone is choosing to punish said children it is the parents who care more about wanting children-despite real limitations-than what their situation will mean to those children and their future. NOT MAKING a child is not the same as killing it once it's made. The first is sacrifice- the latter murder.
I would not want to make a child who will suffer along with me-or inherit the same disease. I do not understand those who choose to do that. That is my opinion.You don't have to agree with it, but equating choosing NOT to create life to exterminating it is ludicrous. No babies by choice is not the same as murdering them in gas chambers.
60 posted on
11/16/2017 8:00:53 AM PST by
ClearBlueSky
(ISLAM is the problem. ISLAM is the enemy of civilization.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson