Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court Filings In House Intel Legal Battle For Dossier Firm Docs To Be Made Public
Talking Points Memo ^ | 11/15/2017 | By TIERNEY SNEED

Posted on 11/15/2017 2:55:07 PM PST by SSS Two

A federal judge said Wednesday that the legal fight over whether the House Intelligence Committee can subpoena the bank records of the Trump dossier firm was too important for the filings in the case to remain under seal.

U.S. District Judge Richard Leon told lawyers representing the firm Fusion GPS, its bank and the House of Representative that they needed rework court pleadings filed previously under seal so that they could be made available to the public.

“Let the public see the pleadings,” Leon said. “This is not a normal case.”

After asking that the court documents be refiled next Tuesday, Leon scheduled a hearing for Nov. 30.

For weeks Fusion GPS and the House Intelligence Committee have been battling over the subpoenas the committee has issued for the firm as part of its Russia investigation.

Fusion GPS hired ex-British spy Christopher Steele to compile the dossier last year as part of a opposition research projected being funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee. The dossier made several allegations, many highly scandalous, regarding President Trump’s Russia ties, and some of them have been borne out by subsequent revelations.

At one point, Fusion GPS’ lawyers accused House Intel Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) of engaging in a “pattern of unprofessional conduct” in the committee’s investigation into the firm’s role.

The firm’s founder, Glenn Simpson, was interviewed by the House Intel Committee Tuesday, after reaching an agreement that Fusion’s lawyer Joshua Levy said allowed the firm to maintain “the confidentiality of their clients.”

The legal battle over the banking records began last month, but it appeared that an agreement on turning over the records had been reached a week after the initial complaint was filed.

However, that agreement apparently fell apart over the committee’s most recent set of demands, and Fusion GPS filed a motion earlier this month seeking a temporary restraining order to prevent the bank from handing over the records. The firm said the committee was seeking records not in the “furtherance of any legitimate legislative purpose, but instead to annoy, harass, and punish Fusion GPS. ”

Most of the court documents since have been filed under seal, and some aspects of the case may need to be still kept out of the public view, Leon said Thursday. Instead of deciding on a temporary restraining order, Leon said he would be assessing later this month whether to impose a preliminary injunction on enforcing the subpoena.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/15/2017 2:55:07 PM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

Sweet!


2 posted on 11/15/2017 3:01:52 PM PST by STJPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two
Most of the court documents since have been filed under seal, and some aspects of the case may need to be still kept out of the public view, Leon said Thursday. Instead of deciding on a temporary restraining order, Leon said he would be assessing later this month whether to impose a preliminary injunction on enforcing the subpoena.

It seems to me that this serves the same function as a TRO. The House's subpoena can't be enforced until later this month.

3 posted on 11/15/2017 3:04:11 PM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STJPII

Got rid of the Obama Judge Fusion GPS must be scared now


4 posted on 11/15/2017 3:04:53 PM PST by scooby321 (o even lower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

“...Judge Richard Leon told lawyers representing the firm Fusion GPS, its bank and the House of Representative that they needed rework court pleadings filed previously under seal...”

So the judge is giving Fusion a chance to change their filings, now that they reached an out of court agreement? That sounds totally wrong — why let them alter the record in some self-serving way? Stalin would be proud.


5 posted on 11/15/2017 3:24:08 PM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

NOBODY can legally stand in the way of a Congressional subpoena.

The only role of the Judiciary would be to reinforce the demand of a coequal branch.

However, these Federal judges just don’t care about legal.

Eventually it get to a higher court and they usually rule correctly on such matters.


6 posted on 11/15/2017 3:24:21 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson