Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese Auto Glass Magnate Faces Union Challenge in Ohio (the UAW lost)
New York Times ^ | 11/08/2017 | KEITH BRADSHER, NOAM SCHEIBER

Posted on 11/11/2017 7:33:02 AM PST by FreedomNotSafety

"The vote is widely seen as an indication of how Chinese companies that are building or buying factories in the United States might handle the delicate subject of labor relations. Unions in China are strictly controlled by the Communist Party. Unauthorized strikes or demonstrations are often quickly shut down."

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: china; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: central_va

If this Chinese dude was employing 2,000 Mexicans and Chinese at his Ohio plant you might have a point, but I think you’re posting crap here that belongs on another thread.


21 posted on 11/11/2017 9:47:51 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety
Local News Link

I scanned the Times article, but missed any reference to the most important information, which to me gives an insight into the attitude of the people of South West Ohio.

"Employees at Fuyao Glass America voted by a resounding margin Thursday against joining the United Auto Workers, defeating the union’s more than 18-month attempt to organize one of the Dayton area’s fastest growing manufacturers, in a fight that drew the international spotlight.

The final tally was 886 to 441, according to the National Labor Relations Board, which oversaw the election."

22 posted on 11/11/2017 10:07:01 AM PST by j_guru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j_guru

Thanks for posting that. I was wondering the same thing, especially when I saw the “UAW lost” item in the title of the thread. It looks like the NYT article was posted on 11/8 — just BEFORE the union vote.


23 posted on 11/11/2017 10:24:56 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

You are correct. The Times ran this favorable article about the owner of this company prior to the unionization election. I cannot fathom why. There must be a devious Machiavellian reason as to why they would paint a favorable portrait instead of what is usually portrayed, an evil profit grubbing capitalist.


24 posted on 11/11/2017 11:08:29 AM PST by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Theoria
Lol...illegal = strictly controlled.

No, actually, not allowed to exist. They never make it to the stage of controlled. Unions are illegal in China.

25 posted on 11/11/2017 1:41:23 PM PST by gunsequalfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson