Posted on 10/27/2017 9:14:10 PM PDT by repentant_pundit
RUSH TRANSCRIPT:
COOPER: "David, how serious is this for the Trump Administration?"
GERGEN: "Well, it certainly looks like the dam is starting to break, Anderson, after a long while. I think we're going to be in expense suspense over the next couple of days as to what charges are. If they're about money laundering that's going to send a shutter through the warehouse. What that'll suggest is two things, first of all, the president has been wrong there's nothing to this. There's probably cause to believe in Mueller's mind that in fact crimes were committed. And in that zone -- and there's much better chance of flipping somebody if that's -- that that's the area that -- where the evidence has taken them. On the other hand, if you say it's a manafort and he's indicted for some illegal money trafficking he had some time ago, that suggests they got very little on the question of collusion and on money laundering. I think a lot depends on what charges are, as an addition to. If it's money laundering or collusion I think Jeffrey and Carl are right. There's going to be a big effort to flip who ever it is that's indicted."
Forget DC. You’ll find plenty of anti-Americans to tar and feather in the faculty of your nearest college.
.
The constitution is clear and plain.
Ken Starr is a boob, and a fraud.
Also, the chief executive cannot “obstruct justice” since he is in charge of the entire federal operation.
To prosecute or not prosecute is ultimately his perogative, however politically entangling that may be.
.
I see that you said it.When did you get the first clue?
Looks like Starr is plugged into the corrupt state and the special counsel coup.
They’re both full of sh!t
It’s really all BS speculation until Monday and Trump didn’t “collude” with Russia through Manafort to beat Hellary.
Long ago. I recognize a money laundering investigation when I see it ;-)
Whatta bout SWATing him?
Con law scholars have given the arguments. You can agree or disagree but you cannot say it has been decided as a matter of law by Scotus as they didnt get to that argument with nixon.
And yes..if Muller indicts trump..Scotus will decide.
They are not going to get away with this. Trump has the power to pardon. Illegal activities by players in the last administration set phony wheels in motion to illegally investigate people. We may well find out that someday a FISA judge is going to be very angry with this whole thing. It is going to backfire.
“Con law scholars have given the arguments.”
Translation: Leftist aholes have given the arguments
We’re already in a constitutional crisis with the lawless state of the courts. One more outrageous unconstitutional overreach may be their last.
Take a hike
Don’t go all wobbly on us now. I bet you $500 Trump is on top of this.
Gergen is a moron!
I won’t take the bet. :)
Doug is giving inside of charges that’s all.He is for Trump.What cracks me up is a Grand Jury is sworn to secrecy. If this decision was reached it was not today.This is getting boring.
Got it.
Paul Manafort was charged under NY State Law rather than federal law.If indeed it is Manafort who is charged POTUS can not pardon (state law https://t.co/iUDAHmJRCZ— Doug Lewis #MAGA (@umpire43) October 28, 2017
This is CNN aka #FakeNews
If it’s Manafort then the Podesta Bros won’t be far behind...
When the information breaks regarding Paul Manafort's involvement in the early phases of UraniumOne with the Podesta Group, don't panic.— NavyJack (@USNJack) October 25, 2017
Although if that's the case, I'm panicked, too close to POTUS with all those trying to frame him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.