Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ennis85

We already had a Southeast Asia communist problem that had our full attention. It was called Vietnam or has the author of the article forgotten?


17 posted on 10/17/2017 5:52:30 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reily; Robert DeLong

That’s the damn thing, Vietnam was an utterly pointless war to fight after 1965, the Communist threat to SE Asia had been all but eliminated after the Indonesian army defeated them.

The reason the US fought in Vietnam was the “domino theory”, ie if one SE Asia country fell they would all do so. And of course the biggest domino was Indonesia, it didn’t matter if Vietnam, Laos or Cambodia fell to the Communists (as they eventually did anyway) what was important was stopping the massive nation of Indonesia falling.

With the wipe out of the Communists in Indonesia (and the earlier defeat by the Brits in Malaya) there was no goddamned reason to fight in Vietnam, the threat had been neutralised, but instead the US fought on for another disastrous six years fighting a war that was utterly pointless.

Suharto had already saved SE Asia.


36 posted on 10/18/2017 2:57:58 AM PDT by Postman Pat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson