Gee,
My reading of the situation at the Daily Mail link indicates Perry is trying to increase the reliability of generation on behalf of the American people.
Adding a favorable regulation to support coal and nuke power because their fuel is onsite, and it pisses off the Natural Gas folks who are subject to interruption.
Another regulation for a heavily regulated industry. And, it just so happens to be in OUR interests.
...Perry is trying to increase the reliability of generation on behalf of the American people.
Adding a favorable regulation to support coal and nuke power because their fuel is onsite, and it pisses off the Natural Gas folks who are subject to interruption.
Another regulation for a heavily regulated industry. And, it just so happens to be in OUR interests.
_______
Deserves to be repeated.
Thanks for addressing the topic, not the person.
“Adding a favorable regulation to support coal and nuke power because their fuel is onsite, and it pisses off the Natural Gas folks who are subject to interruption.”
Natural gas companies are welcome to store fuel on their sites, if they want...gas is stored in large tanks throughout the country.
As to this proposal, it’s better than nothing, but I’d MUCH RATHER see an effort to harden our grid against EMPs...but sadly Trump’s people are as complacent as Obama’s and prior, they look at EMPs (and CMEs) as something out of Art Bell’s fertile imagination.