Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jalisco555

Not an accident. I believe the phrase is negligent discharge. Unless there is something mechanically wrong with the firearm, they don’t just fire on their own. They only fire when the person handling them operates them intentionally, or does something stupid and careless. Stupid and careless are not good qualities for anyone handling a firearm, particularly law enforcement who are supposed to be trained and conscientious.


4 posted on 10/17/2017 4:49:27 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Doing my part to help make America great again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ThunderSleeps

You are correct. I hate the term “accidental discharge”, which tends to imply there was no human fault involved.

This was quite clearly a negligent discharge.


8 posted on 10/17/2017 4:53:36 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ThunderSleeps
Not an accident. I believe the phrase is negligent discharge.

Of course. This should never happen.

9 posted on 10/17/2017 4:53:58 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("In a Time of Universal Deceit Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act" - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: ThunderSleeps

+1, negligent discharge. Before I even clicked on the article...


30 posted on 10/17/2017 7:56:51 AM PDT by Delmarksman (Pro 2A Anglican American (Ford and Chevy kill more people than guns do, lets ban them))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson