Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/16/2017 11:34:46 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

The story does not say what the Supreme Court *did*.

Reading between the lines, it sounds like it did not grant cert to the case (which is what it does with 99% of the cases).


2 posted on 10/16/2017 11:39:53 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

More ignorant crap from an AP reporter who doesn’t understand the law. The Supreme Court didn’t side with anyone. They denied certiorari and won’t hear the case, so the 10th Circuit decision stands. They are asked to take thousands of cases every year but only take a couple hundred.


4 posted on 10/16/2017 11:45:48 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Once again a fable is upheld as law but unelected tyrants.


5 posted on 10/16/2017 11:52:23 AM PDT by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Discouraging.


7 posted on 10/16/2017 3:23:24 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

However, David Cortman . . . said the outcome did nothing to resolve confusion in lower courts involving such monuments.<>

One of the reasons for the Federal Convention of 1787 was to design a plan that reduced the mutability of the law. Thanks to rats and Scotus, the law is whatever a shifting balance of four to five blackrobes and the administrative state say it is. Scotus does little of what it is supposed to do, and much of what is has no power to do.


9 posted on 10/16/2017 3:40:57 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Then how come the religion of no God(Atheism) is taught exclusively in Government run schools?

The court should read the 1st amendment, it says “...Congress shall make no law respecting... the establishment of religion.”

Congress had nothing to do with that monument to the origin’s of our law. This of course stands quite in contrast with the U.S. Supreme court’s own building and practices which contain the same ‘religious’ symbols of the origin of our laws which congress has a lot to do with.

Those men and women in black robes are nothing more than the U.S. Supreme court of lawless hypocrites.


10 posted on 10/16/2017 6:40:41 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai; LegendHasIt; leapfrog0202; Santa Fe_Conservative; DesertDreamer; OneWingedShark; ...

NM list PING!

I may not PING for all New Mexico articles. To see New Mexico articles by topic click here: New Mexico Topics

To see NM articles by keyword, click here: New Mexico Keywords

To see the NM Message Page, click here: New Mexico Messages

(The NM list is available on my FR homepage for anyone to use. Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)
(For ABQ Journal articles requiring a subscription, scroll down to the bottom of the page to view the article for free after answering a question or watching a short video commercial.)

11 posted on 10/17/2017 4:40:38 PM PDT by CedarDave (Alt-left hates presidents pics on paper money. I'll gladly collect those offensive bills from them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson