Trump did’t have much to do with their demise.
They were toast when he came into office, now they’re burnt toast.
My mistake. It must have been some other president who has allowed the military to do their job without tying their hands.
Actually a real turning point was when Trump untied our militarys hands. That MOAB on HQ was a good example. It was a local call by the theater commander, somthing that was strictly verboten under the pink tutu prince Obama.
“Trump did’t have much to do with their demise.”
He just did what I said he should do. He stopped paying them.
What an ignorant statement.
Do you really think they would be dead under a President Hillary?
They are dead because of Trump.
You are UN-informed. The difference is that Trump has given a free hand to MILITARY leaders on how to prosecute war against ISIS, versus Obama who tied their hands behind their backs.
“Trump did’t have much to do with their demise.”
I think he has everything to do with their demise. Just like Reagan did with the Iran hostages.
Trump changed the ROE’s. We were then able to be much more efficient in finishing them off.
“Trump did’t have much to do with their demise.”
BS. Obama was protecting them from annihilation. He only allowed limited minor attacks and called off most of those.
Trump, however, ordered ISIS to be destroyed. Our bombings and attacks have been wiping them out.
“Trump did’t have much to do with their demise.”
total anti-trump bullshit. either you’re an anti-trumper or completely ignorant about what’s happening in Syria, or heck, maybe both.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3594945/posts
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/268119/isis-run-under-trump-joseph-klein