Posted on 10/10/2017 1:47:53 PM PDT by detective
The "non-scandal" scandal involving a former I.T. aide to several Democratic congressmen, including Debbie Wasserman Schultz, took an interesting turn when the wife of the alleged hacker and fraudster Imran Awan showed up in court separate from her husband and had retained a separate attorney.
Imran Awan's own wife, Hina Alvi, filed papers in a Pakistani court accusing her husband of fraud and of marrying another woman. The couple did not look at each other when they showed up in federal court on Friday.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Make it easy, the RAT party.
“...when the wife of the alleged hacker and fraudster Imran Awan showed up in court...”
That would be a UNITED STATES court...a court that neither of them considers legitimate, at least if they keep to their ‘faith’.
So I wouldn’t get too excited about this - more likely the two of them are up to something and will snake out of it.
It acts like the lawyer-client and cleric penitent privileges. It does not require that he be in jeopardy. It preserves the confidentiality of communications.
You mean the way Sessions goes after high value politicians? Please, these people protect one another. They’ll have this guy give testimony under the guise of national security, we’ll never see it, then he gets the book thrown at him. We come out and blame rogue elements in Pakistani intelligence and anyone here politically connected gets a visit from the FBI telling them they can’t do whatever it is they did and that will be it. At the very worst it will be a Comey type statement about Hillary. So and so was careless and lax but not criminal.
Sadly, you better believe thats how it will stay.
totally agree. Its not like she isn’t aware that under their faith he can take more than one wife. How do we know she’s really upset about it or just playing a role? She can testify and steer the inquiry away from any serious misdeeds but it looks good because shes got her own lawyer and pretending to be antagonistic towards him.
Reminds me, and probably you, of all the hopes we had when Bill Clinton was president. Now, this one, for sure, will bring Clinton down...only to be a dud. I’ll believe she means business when I see it.
...and, come to think of it, it he still has a bunch of assets, and she sues to get half, can the US government then go after her share, since she isn’t being charged? Might just be a good scheme here by them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.