Posted on 10/07/2017 11:22:56 AM PDT by BenLurkin
I was frankly shocked that prior to this bills passage, California had such strict laws regarding AIDS. A throwback to a saner age?
One more reason to not visit California or accept any blood from there.
I can’t imagine why someone, anyone, would threaten the blood supply. There has got to be some injunctive relief somewhere, and soon.
Using the same logic if I point a gun at someone and pull the trigger and they die my defense should be “I did not know it might kill them.”
HIV positives that have sex and do not tell the partner know “their gun” was loaded and know it might kill their sex partner.
Jerry Brown is insane.
Wow!
The measure also applies to those who give blood without telling the blood bank that they are HIV-positive.
Why go through all the risk of getting mugged or stepping on a needle?
Just go have an accident, get taken to the hospital, and get some blood. The end result will probably be the same (for you). If you survive the hospital, you'll have a fair chance of a slow, lingering death from AIDS or Hepatitis.
But at least the "gay" community won't be insulted.
My question...Can donated blood given by a gay with new hiv ,even he doesn’t know yet,be caught when it’s tested??? Or can they only catch the hiv after its full blown..There is a 2-4 week period when it starts up in your body and you don’t know it yet.....
All I know is that I don’t want any transfusions unless absolutely necessary.
Only exposing others through donating HIV-laced blood should be a felony. Let them continue making HIV the “gay disease.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.