Replies

How would Mossad profit from being involved? The 4chan posts add up because they predicted the location, mentioned casinos, and supplied a motive. The motive makes sense because it was done once already. First, 9-11, then TSA and ridiculously expensive and ineffective scanning equipment at every airport. To date the TSA hasn’t caught a single terrorist, but it has greatly expanded the government and lined countless pockets with its exorbitant expenditures.

But that well is running dry. Deep State needs a new cash cow. To make it happen, follow the previously successful business model.

I.e.: create a mass murder, and then implement an expensive response. In Vegas we have ~500 casualties. When the gun control hysteria dies down, ‘cooler heads will prevail.’ Congress will mandate another massively expensive fix. Casinos will come first, but next will be universities, schools, hospitals, conserts, fairs—you name it. They may be able to include churches that exceed a certain membership number.

Connected people will make a fortune. That is the goal.

My prior post is not to be interpreted an 9-11 trutherism. It was a terrorist attack from start to finish. However, the deep state figured out a way to make billions off it.

The Vegas massacre is different, if the 4chan poster was right, in that it was a manufactured slaughter. But it was done in such a way as to yield similar longterm benefits as the 9-11 terrorist attacks.

How would Mossad profit from being involved?

I have no idea; I didn't say I believed it, but it's something I saw floating around I thought was interesting.

The 4chan posts add up because they predicted the location, mentioned casinos, and supplied a motive. The motive makes sense because it was done once already. First, 9-11, then TSA and ridiculously expensive and ineffective scanning equipment at every airport. To date the TSA hasn’t caught a single terrorist, but it has greatly expanded the government and lined countless pockets with its exorbitant expenditures.

Oh, I agree; the 4chan posts have more coherence WRT motive. And I firmly believe the TSA is a con, likely for purposes of (a) conditioning Americans to accept arbitrary and unlawful exercises of power, while (b) providing a highly visible (i.e. for display purposes) example of doing something, in addition to installing yet another bureaucracy into the federal behemoth that needs funding. [Like how the excuses made when city/county budgets get tight and they threaten/FUD-about fire- and police-services rather than reducing administration and/or cracking down on corruption. Every single time. (Sometimes teachers are in that group, too; though that's more at the state-level.)]

Congress will mandate another massively expensive fix. Casinos will come first, but next will be universities, schools, hospitals, conserts, fairs—you name it. They may be able to include churches that exceed a certain membership number.

Connected people will make a fortune. That is the goal.

This is true; the whole never let a crisis go to waste philosophy that we heard leaked [from, IIRC, Rahm Emmanuel] is quite telling: it doesn't matter if the crisis was foreign, or not, or 'natural' or false-flag — they were always going to jump aboard to try to ram through everything from gun-control to expansions to the scope of TSA to kickback fueled boondoggles… to the outside observer it's throw everything at the wall and see what sticks.

In fact, we've seen this all before WRT gun-control: the Gun Control Act of 1968 was initially prompted by the assassination of U.S. President John F. Kennedy in 1963, and that's without touching on any of the myriad of theories on his assassination.