Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Catmom

Sixty four is not old age, not by a long shot

64 is the new 45


63 posted on 10/02/2017 5:20:02 AM PDT by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: bert

Well, I’m 63 and I say 64 is WAY too old for this $h!t.


68 posted on 10/02/2017 5:22:39 AM PDT by Catmom (We're all gonna get the punishment only some of us deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: bert

64 the new 45...? Not really; plenty of people die in their mid sixties from natural causes, not too much at 45...


75 posted on 10/02/2017 5:28:17 AM PDT by IrishBrigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: bert
"Sixty four is not old age, not by a long shot"

Thanks.

I'm 74 and just entering old-age.

76 posted on 10/02/2017 5:28:42 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: bert
Sixty four is not old age, not by a long shot

64 is the new 45

I do not feel 45 and now with Obamacare, I don't feel comfortable about 65.

213 posted on 10/02/2017 7:20:18 AM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: bert

Sixty four is close to retirement age and is considered a senior citizen. While death at sixty four would be considered premature now a day,it’s definitely not comparable to being forty five.


289 posted on 10/02/2017 8:51:11 AM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson