Much of what constitutes sex education these days is worldview deconstruction (Scientific? Hardly. Often anti-rational) and training for depravity. I know, because I used to advocate for it; and I have studied its institutional supports (PP, SEICUS, UNFPA), its financial resources (tax dollars and internationalist "philanthropic" fellowships and funds like Ford, Rockefeller, Bill & Melinda Gates and, BTW, Playboy) and its results.
Much of it measured in antibiotic-resistant pathogens, family non-formation, and prenatal death.
I think you would change your view if you looked very closely at that bottom line.
There are plenty of idiots and perverts teaching out there that make news but exactly WHAT about reasonable sex education is not scientific? This is what they told me and all my peers:
1) You can get horrifying and deadly diseases by having sex with infected people. And sometimes you may not know they are infected by looking at them. Showed us pictures of said diseases. Explained to us that condoms do not protect you 100% from these disease.
2) If you have unprotected sex, the female will most likely get pregnant. ALL birth control methods can fail and they gave us the exact percentages. Ladies, if you don’t want a baby or risky abortion surgery, DON’T have sex.
HOW is that any worse than saying people will go burn in a lake of fire for eternity because a God they have never seen told some men thousands of years ago to write a book? And that book specifically prohibits it because God said so!
Sorry, people no longer buy it...