Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

Since the Constitution does not give the fed govt. control over health care, O-care is unconstitutional, but then there are lots of other unconstitutional laws and rulings. In spite of that, I think it’s very likely Dems would challenge either an EO or law passed by congress that would allow a healthcare policy described in this article (for example buying policies across state lines).


38 posted on 09/28/2017 2:40:35 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Mozart tells you what it's like to be human. Bach tells you what it's like to be the universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

They might challenge bills to do that, but I don’t see a problem with government declaring markets open for business.

One could also attack what’s going on now as a restraint of trade.

I want things handled through Congress, because I want it clear we have complied with the Constitution to get things done.

There’s also a problem, of a future president simply pulling out his pen and cancelling things not handled by Constitutional methods.


39 posted on 09/28/2017 2:46:35 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (John McBane is the turd in the national punch-bowl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson