Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO


1 posted on 09/21/2017 4:38:32 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

The Business that was sued




2 posted on 09/21/2017 4:41:11 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The people who filed the lawsuit likely shopped until they found a Christian and went after him.


3 posted on 09/21/2017 4:42:56 PM PDT by Michael.SF. (Women who are 25 pounds overweight tend to live longer than the men who mention it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Mr. Adamson’s problem is that he believes there’s any semblance of an attempt at being fair with this forced speech against conscience. Name anyone else who is being forced to do so, other than fundamentalist Christians. Are atheists being forced to print Christian messages? No. Are Muslims being forced to print gay messages? No. Who else is being forced? Nobody. And therein lies your answer.


4 posted on 09/21/2017 4:44:20 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

He naively thinks this was about T-shirts. T-shirts (and cakes) are just the tool. The Goal is forced acceptance of an abhorrent lifestyle.


5 posted on 09/21/2017 4:44:48 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The so-called birthright citizenship clause:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

There are two tests here.  

Lets look at test one.

Here's how Leftists read it.


All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

Does this grant citizenship to all persons born in the United States?

On the face of it no.  It doesn't even come close to saying that.

The inclusion of an additional stipulation in addition to simply being born on our soil, renders this a false premise.  All persons are not granted citizenship for having been born here, without being judged to be under the jurisdiction thereof.

For this reason, it is a false premise to state every person born in the United States is a citizen
.

Now lets look at test two.

...and subject to the jurisdiction thereof...

Leftists love to claim that illegal aliens must abide by the laws of the United States (all except immigrating legally, I presume).  This they use as primafacia evidence that illegals aliens "...are subject to the jurisdiction thereof,...".

Is that true?  NO, and it's a very easy thing to test.

The very inclusion of this verbage in the amendment deligitimizes this claim.

If being on U.S. soil made illegal aliens "...subject of the jurisdiction thereof..." all by itself, this further stipulation would not have been provided.

If all illegal aliens were subject to the jurisdication thereof, the Citizenship claus would read, "
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Jurisdiction language would not be necessary, and it would not have been included.

The jurisdiction language had to be addressing something different than merely being present in the United States, when being born.

Conclusion:


The 14th Amendment does not grant citizenship to illegal aliens born on U.S. soil.





6 posted on 09/21/2017 4:44:56 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (DACA: Their dream, our nightmare... will the rule of law prevail or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Freedom of the press means I have the right to print (you know, on a press) what *I* want; not what someone else wants.

A tee-shirt printing operation is a printing press by definition. This guy should be able to print what *he* wants, for whatever reason.


8 posted on 09/21/2017 4:48:24 PM PDT by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Marriage - politicized
Dating - politicized
School - politicized
Military - politicized
Fraternities - politicized
Sports - politicized
T-shirt making - politicized

WHAT DID I MISS..?


16 posted on 09/21/2017 5:10:57 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson