>
>>
“and mere possession of such a kit, even if you don’t use it to actually convert a Glock, is illegal.”
>>
Have you got a source for that? That is a very slippery slope.
>
No offense, but atrocious how quickly some have conceded the Leftist tactics and language.
“Shall not be infringed” voids the whole need for ‘sources’, let alone *LICENSE*, BATF, Schedule XYZ a/o any other unlawful edict\rule\regulation\’law’...
20K+ infringements and as many more the Totalitarians can muster, while the (R)\(C) go threading a needle through a gnats @sshole on ‘technicalities’ instead of starting @ Step\Debate point #1: by what authority?
Look at my tagline - I do NOT agree with the 50,000 (20K is very dated) infringements. But the reality is that if you get caught violating one or more, you will more often than not be prosecuted. If you’re up to getting arrested,charged and convicted of such, just to make a point, then good luck to you. I don’t like it, and do what I can to fight it, but reality is reality.