Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
That is such bull shiite.
2 posted on
09/17/2017 10:35:01 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
I don’t even need to read that article to know that they couldn’t be more wrong.
3 posted on
09/17/2017 10:35:56 PM PDT by
Bullish
(Whatever it takes to MAGA)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
4 posted on
09/17/2017 10:36:04 PM PDT by
FreedomStar3028
(Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
they plan to market Brawndo worldwide
5 posted on
09/17/2017 10:38:02 PM PDT by
KTM rider
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Tillerson is a friggin saboteur doing his best to undermine Presdent Trump. If Trump holds his course on pulling out of the ridiculous accord, history will show he had great wisdom & foresight. The saboteur globalists don’t want that!
6 posted on
09/17/2017 10:38:31 PM PDT by
House Atreides
(Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
7 posted on
09/17/2017 10:38:38 PM PDT by
Repeal The 17th
(I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The terms of the Paris Agreement are set in stone, the EU, China and Canada agreed at a summit in Montreal this weekendGreat news, we have no reason to be in it then.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Many accords like this wind up forcing expensive compliance by Western countries while making excuses for other countries to do anything they want to environmentally.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Someone correct me if I'm wrong: Since the U.S. Senate never ratified the treaty, there is no legally binding agreement.
When Obama had the Senate, they didn't ratify it. Its not going to happen under Trump.
For fun, try searching google or bing on "pollution map" and think about what turns up.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Well that’s nice.
The US constitution says otherwise
12 posted on
09/17/2017 10:48:26 PM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
“...other countries in attendance, agreed the agreement is irreversible and non-negotiable.”
Well bless their hearts... Their so cute when they think they have any authority. Come TRY to enforce it.
13 posted on
09/17/2017 10:52:48 PM PDT by
Made In The USA
(Next thing you know, 'ol Jed's a millionaire)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
with the collapse of ambition in the United States, Europe will ensure we make our planet great again. Our ambitious climate policy agenda has the most important backing of all.Translation: their taxes will skyrocket, while the China, Russia, and India continue to pollute on a Biblical scale.
14 posted on
09/17/2017 10:53:33 PM PDT by
Mark17
(Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD....And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
No news here. Tillerson is repeating what has been Trump’s position all along: renegotiate and we can talk. Otherwise, no. As for the Accord being “non-negotiable”, well, that sort of answers the question, doesn’t it? This part, at least, is irreversible and non-negotiable: no Senate ratification, no treaty. Period.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
A person who signs a contract with a minor has little recourse if the minor refuses to live up to the agreement. Minors are typically unable to enter into binding contracts.
Similarly, the government of the United States does not have the authority to enter into an agreement with a foreign nation in any way that cannot be undone by a future government of the United States. To think otherwise is to grant power to the government which is nowhere to be found in the Constitution.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The terms of the Paris Agreement are set in stone, the EU, China and Canada agreed at a summit in Montreal this weekend,
So we are obligated to do what these countries have decided?? Really??? They decided it is set in stone??? So we have to comply??? This doesn’t make sense.........
To: 2ndDivisionVet
We’ll then, bye. We’re out.
To: 2ndDivisionVet
To: 2ndDivisionVet
" . . . irreversible and non-negotiable . . ."
Jean-Claude Juncker, Xi Jinping, and Justin Trudeau walk into a bar. Juncker says, "Boy, did we tell him off." Jinping says, "He didn't stand a chance." Trudeau says, "We've got him right where he want him."
The bartender turns around and says, "I'm sorry. I can't serve anyone who comes in here with no clothes, no money, and black-and-blue butts."
22 posted on
09/17/2017 11:19:40 PM PDT by
righttackle44
(Take scalps. Leave the bodies as a warning.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
Utter BS from EU weenies.
They can pound sand.
We are out. Period.
23 posted on
09/17/2017 11:26:33 PM PDT by
Texas Fossil
((Texas is not where you were born, but a Free State of Heart, Mind & Attitude!))
To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Senate never approved it. Therefore it is just Obama’s word. If he wants to personally meet all of the obligations he agreed to, he is more than welcome to do so. But, he never had the authority to commit the United States of America to that agreement. It doesn’t matter what the rest of the world says, we are not subject to their decrees.
25 posted on
09/17/2017 11:44:26 PM PDT by
gspurlock
(http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson