Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kalamata
Very true. Freedom of religion was meant to mean tolerance for the different Christian protestant denominations.

That is exactly it's purpose and what it meant back in 1787. It was not speaking towards the issue of Muslims, Hindus or even Jews.

People have since interpreted it as applying to those other religions, but at the time it was written, those other religions were not even in the Founders minds. The prohibition of religious tests mentioned in the constitution was not comprehended to apply to those other groups.

81 posted on 09/16/2017 11:29:41 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

Yep!


82 posted on 09/16/2017 11:34:42 AM PDT by Kalamata (Inside Every Liberal is a Totalitarian Screaming to Get Out - D. Horowitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp

These were some of the most visionary men in history. They may have been culturally, and in many cases religiously, Christian, but they were not narrow-minded men. I can’t believe that they never anticipated that people might come to the US with different religious beliefs and that, if they did, they would not be ‘covered’ by the same principles of religious tolerance that the various Christian denominations were. Or that there would not be times when the federal government would have to intercede in a state’s “business”.

Jews have been here since the 1600s, and have had significant moral and spiritual influence for the good in our society. If we had kept things in the states as some seem to think the Founders intended in this regard, many of those Jews would not have been able to hold public office.

To say that ‘what was the norm back then, cannot be unconstitutional now’ is false, because we have outlawed a number of “norms” from back then – including slavery.

The founders were creating a general, principled system – not dictating how each future, perhaps unforeseeable, issue might be decided by that system and the generations that inherited it.


83 posted on 09/16/2017 4:53:11 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson