Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

Conservatives need to understand:

A. Adam Smith offered a view of free enterprise Capitalism, but he was no fan of monopolies, not even pseudo monopolies - he understood they stand to get rid of, not facilitate, competition and that competition is required for free enterprise capitalism to REMAIN healthy, including the rule-of-law health that underpins it.

B. Antitrust can be used positively, and I believe it has been in some instances (break up of big oil, and break up of Ma Bell for instance).

I am not yet sure of the Antitrust parameters I’d apply to the tech giants, but I think it should be explored and that doing so is not disrespectful to free market capitalism as Adam Smith would suggest if he were around today.


15 posted on 09/10/2017 7:38:57 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wuli

I don’t understand why we wouldn’t break up the tech Giant’s now that they have become top to bottom Market dominators. The Menace of their Monopoly is far more dangerous than AT&T or Standard Oil ever was.

The fact that they are anti-American and Hate Everything the founders stood for just makes it a work of pleasure instead of necessity.


22 posted on 09/10/2017 8:18:09 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson