Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: cotton1706
But why on earth would they want to do that?
He stands up for everything that’s in their “party platform” *snicker*
More actual conservatives in the senate means that they could pass there “conservative agenda” without interference from the likes of all of them. * snicker*
2 posted on
08/18/2017 12:30:50 PM PDT by
chris37
(Donald J. Trump, Tom Brady, The Patriots... American Destiny!)
To: cotton1706
Luther has signed on with the vermin causing our trouble. Judge Moore has not and will not . . . it is that simple.
3 posted on
08/18/2017 12:30:58 PM PDT by
RatRipper
(Unindicted co-conspirators: the Mainstream Media and the Democratic Party)
To: cotton1706
GOPe/UniParty better get used to it....Moore is coming (no pun intended).
5 posted on
08/18/2017 12:32:46 PM PDT by
lgjhn23
(It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
To: cotton1706
President Trump needs to very carefully consider his continued support for Strange in this contest. Endorsing Strange against Brooks and Moore is one thing. Endorsing him against Moore alone is completely different.
6 posted on
08/18/2017 12:32:49 PM PDT by
KyCats
To: cotton1706
Senator Moore has a nice ring to it, God bless you Alabama for sending such a great man to the senate.
7 posted on
08/18/2017 12:32:53 PM PDT by
2001convSVT
(Going Galt as fast as I can.)
To: cotton1706
The Uniparty hates the thought of voters electing candidates who represent the voters.
8 posted on
08/18/2017 12:33:33 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: cotton1706
Here’s hoping Mo Brooks ACTIVELY steps up and supports Moore. It will be repaid down the road big time IMHO.
9 posted on
08/18/2017 12:36:44 PM PDT by
House Atreides
(Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.')
To: cotton1706
12 posted on
08/18/2017 12:39:58 PM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)
To: cotton1706
Brooks is a recovering Never Trumper. No loss, IMO.
13 posted on
08/18/2017 12:39:59 PM PDT by
lodi90
To: cotton1706
You bet? Would Mo Brooks be great? Yes of course but Moore will give us all the votes we’d get from Brooks and would irritate the shit out of the left and GOPe Go Roy go!
14 posted on
08/18/2017 12:45:04 PM PDT by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
To: cotton1706
It’ll depend on turnout and where the backers of the other candidates go.
To: cotton1706
A lot of folks think he can shoot off a lot of fireworks in D.C. while not doing a lot of harm. Or accomplishing anything. He's just there to make a spectacle.
To: cotton1706
67% voted against the appointed incumbent Strange.
Roy Moore looks to be the winner in the runoff.
To: cotton1706
As I understand it Strange hasn’t been too bad....but sided with McConnell.....a big no no.
20 posted on
08/18/2017 12:56:48 PM PDT by
rrrod
(just an old guy with a gun in his pocket.6l)
To: cotton1706
No. The chalk Mgr is to replace, retire a handful of fake conservatives like McShame and his pal Lindsay. And Collins. And a couple more
21 posted on
08/18/2017 12:58:43 PM PDT by
faithhopecharity
("Politicans are not born, they're excreted." -- Marcus Tillius Cicero)
To: cotton1706
I’ve been shocked over the coverage of this race.
Although Moore won the primary, EVERY news source is focusing on Strange as their story.
To: cotton1706
“Here come da judge.” - Flip Wilson
5.56mm
24 posted on
08/18/2017 1:10:29 PM PDT by
M Kehoe
To: cotton1706
70% of GOP primary voters voted against The corrupt Strange one.
70%! If Brooks supporters support the only conservative in the runoff,
Strange will get crushed.
27 posted on
08/18/2017 1:25:18 PM PDT by
tennmountainman
("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small fee.)
To: cotton1706
The GOP "establishment" need to understand they have positions in a political party. Those positions do not authorize them to dictate to the membership. If they have an argument, put it forward. Their constituents will decide what to do about that argument. Arrogant snits over their constituents rejecting the argument, can only diminish any future influence that they might otherwise have.
Unless they really are stupid, they had better listen to those constituents.
30 posted on
08/18/2017 1:37:33 PM PDT by
Ohioan
To: cotton1706
virulently social conservative views Interesting and wholly contradictory in terms of the English language.
31 posted on
08/18/2017 1:37:38 PM PDT by
arthurus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson