Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeReign; 9YearLurker
Actually, I was required to know what that means. I’m uncertain that you have any idea what it means.

Apparently I still know more than you about what it means, because the sentence is directly related to her own work product.

That means Susan Rice doesn't need permission to access her own product. And it also means that if she leaks information that McMaster gave her access to, it will be information that she already knew about since it's her work product to begin with.

Quit trying so hard. You're all sweaty.

215 posted on 08/18/2017 10:59:10 AM PDT by Greetings_Puny_Humans (I mostly come out at night... mostly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies ]


To: Greetings_Puny_Humans
That means Susan Rice doesn't need permission to access her own product.

Yes it's about her former work product but it's also about any other classified information that she has had previous access to.

Eliminating the Need to Know for Rice, gives Rice the power to determine if and when she wishes to see those classified items. She will not need to demonstrate a need to know to anybody up the security chain.

If McMaster wants to leave her clearance in place, it would be better to leave in the Need to Know requirement, that is required by almost everybody else with a security clearance.

Quit trying so hard. You're all sweaty.

LOL, it's like hitting watermelons with a baseball bat.

237 posted on 08/18/2017 11:30:10 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson