To: TigerClaws
While I don’t like removal of statutes in general, I don’t have a problem with removing Roger Taney’s statute. He was the Harry Blackmun of his day, twisting the Constitution to support Dem causes.
5 posted on
08/18/2017 8:43:55 AM PDT by
Opinionated Blowhard
("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
To: Opinionated Blowhard
He was the Harry Blackmun of his day, twisting the Constitution to support Dem causes.
You are probably one of a handful of people in the entire country that knows (or cares) about that. How does removing a statue change that?
Next will be history revisionists and book burning. Will you support that too.
30 posted on
08/18/2017 9:28:51 AM PDT by
lewislynn
( Transgender: A person who thinks s/he's wrong side out.)
To: Opinionated Blowhard
While I don’t like removal of statutes in general, I don’t have a problem with removing Roger Taney’s statute. He was the Harry Blackmun of his day, twisting the Constitution to support Dem causes. How did he twist the constitution?
40 posted on
08/18/2017 10:44:53 AM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson