Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WashingtonSource; DoodleDawg; rockrr
How sick and depraved to tarnish the reputation of your forebears who are not here to defend themselves. That takes a special level of moral degeneracy and indecency.

How tarnish? They say they're not ashamed of their ancestor.

Moral degeneracy and indecency? There were many people in history that you might be uncomfortable being descended from, does that make you indecent or a degenerate?

I don't share their sentiments (shame at the monument, guilt over white privilege), but Stonewall Jackson was a convinced Christian and maybe he would.

Maybe he wouldn't have wanted statues of himself put up in the same way that many war heroes don't like to talk about their experiences.

The monuments usually weren't put up by the people they depict.

Sometimes it was those who never saw action who were most devoted to the myths.

24 posted on 08/17/2017 3:47:35 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: x

I have a very close friend who is a descendent of Nathan Bedford Forrest. (I actually looked into this, and it checks out).

Needless to say, this is a pretty complicated legacy.

The family position seems to be, “He was a brilliant soldier and never intended for the Klan to become what it was. At the same time, his tactics, his cause, and his legacy are not anything we endorse.”


51 posted on 08/18/2017 7:51:02 AM PDT by WVMnteer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson