Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KeyLargo
It's clear the Left's tactics to shutting down any form of disagreement have changed.

Instead of screaming, banging on doors, breaking windows and beating up people for which the Left is roundly condemned by normal Americans, they've been able to convince municipal authorities and other elected representatives to:

Step 1: Issue a permit for a patriotic American group to hold a rally in the name of "free speech" and "tolerance"
Step 2: A few days later issue a permit for a Leftist group to hold a rally in the same local area and on the same day as the normal peoples' rally
Step 3: Publicly announce grave concerns with the likelihood of violence at the competing rallies
Step 4: In the name of "public safety" rescind the patriotic American's group permit.

The result is a glorious victory for the Leftist thugs who will have not only stopped the Right from speaking, they will be subsequently praised 24/7 by the Left, fake-news media for their wisdom in preventing violence.

So, what's the high-hard counterpunch to this new intolerance?

14 posted on 08/17/2017 7:18:11 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All

Where in the Constitution does it say a permit is required to hold a “peaceful assembly”?


18 posted on 08/17/2017 7:43:00 AM PDT by Terry Mross (Liver spots And blood thinners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: glennaro

“So, what’s the high-hard counterpunch to this new intolerance?”


Go to federal court and prove this. Do it once, and now you have a precedent. When some other municipality in the same jurisdiction does the same thing, sue the mayor, chief of police, etc., etc. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivation of civil rights under color of law.

Frankly, McAuliffe and everyone in Charlotte guilty of a role in cancelling the protest on Saturday, and in failing to provide protection to the protesters that day, should be sued. These are PERSONAL suits, for which their official position does NOT immunize them (in fact, it is the basis of the suit - that they used their position to violate your rights).


22 posted on 08/17/2017 8:25:12 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson