Posted on 08/16/2017 11:45:10 AM PDT by Cubs Fan
Lots of accounts from left right and all in between. Show the violence was, just as trump says, on both sides.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
Neither side was the CAUSE, they were the “result” ... the cause was the CITY COUNCIL trying to revise USA History. Any death, and all violence and all the blood is on their HANDS. Was it “worth it” City Council? Actions have consequences. Why in hell does the City Council get a pass on this?
The 0:13 mark in “my” video is a very blurry video of the crash in progress, nothing visible on his car at all.
Use a photo tool that allows you to zoom in and look at the front windshield. It is located to the right of the rear window break light. You will see the smashed windshield.
also see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iS9cbH_KfMw at the 10 second mark. You will see a pedestrian from the left sidewalk step out and strike the car. This is before the impact with the crowd.
Again...
https://twitter.com/brennanmgilmore/status/896434516260212737/video/1
After he had sped towards them for nearly a block. No damage visible in the video or the pic. In fact his windshield isn't visible in any way in either.
Apparently you think hitting three bodies had nothing to do with the damage to his windshield. Suit yourself.
Not sure, but the rumor I heard was that it started with a guy in New Orleans who wants to start or has a museum on slavery. But he wants to do it with other people’s money and property, so he started a campaign to have the confederate monuments in New Orleans taken down and relocated to his place.
Stand corrected.
Things would have gone so much better had both sides just sent letters to the editor and to their reps...
Then again, the editor would refuse to publish the views of one side annd the rep would try to distance himself from one side because he’s afraid of the other side’s control of the press and what that means for his next election run.
As a result, we get more stupid demonstrations that don’t change anyone’s mind, either.
So they had permits for other parks, but NO permit to gather at Emancipation park.
So they were there illegally..
Democrats?
What I believe is based on the photo evidence:
1) an illegal protest (riot) was in progress
2) individuals from that illegal protest were blocking a street
3) individuals were attacking the car
4) AFTER the attack on the car, the car THEN impacted the crowd
5) the crowd then continued to attack the car
6) the car, no longer able to go forward, then reversed in an attempt to flee the riot.
Those are the facts as seen in the photo evidence.
It doesn’t matter. They have a 2nd Amendment right to bear arms.
1) an illegal protest (riot) was in progress Irrelevant to the crash.
2) individuals from that illegal protest were blocking a street Irrelevant to the crash.
3) individuals were attacking the car After it sped down a block towards them.
4) AFTER the attack on the car, the car THEN impacted the crowd False.
5) the crowd then continued to attack the car Who could blame them?
6) the car, no longer able to go forward, then reversed in an attempt to flee the riot. AKA fleeing the scene of an accident.
Those are the facts as seen in the photo evidence. No they're not.
1) Not irrelevant as it is the first domino, the initial illegal activity. Had there been no illegal protest, there would not have been protesters blocking the road.
2) Not irrelevant as it is the second domino. Had the street been clear, no one would have been there to be hurt.
3) The car was LEGALLY traveling down the one way street. You are ASSUMING that he was speeding and have not presented any proof that he was speeding. The fact remains that the crowd was illegally in the street, he was not.
4) In fact true. Photo evidence of windshield damage prior to impacting the crowd and video evidence of an individual striking the car prior to impact to the crowd.
5) I can blame them because it is called assault with a deadly weapon.
6) Fleeing to avoid bodily injury or possible death is not a crime and is in fact, a mitigation against the charge of fleeing in many states.
You may not think that they are facts, and you are entitled to ignore any evidence you want. However, they are still facts.
If the city council is elected, and wants to eliminate statues on city property for any reason or no reason at all, why wouldn’t they have the right to do so without violence erupting or nonresidents on one or more sides meddling in their affairs?
Shouldn’t it be between the city council and city residents and not outsiders?
ROTFLMAO
I have presented it over and over and unlike what you call facts it is patently obvious and doesn't require seeing things that can't be seen.
https://twitter.com/brennanmgilmore/status/896434516260212737/video/1
He starts speeding towards a dense crowd of people from a block away at a point on the street where there were very few people, none of whom were paying attention to him, with a near empty intersection directly behind him and a totally empty street on the other side of the intersection.
Where was the cause for panic?
They showed restraint. I probably would have shot those mother ——!
2.5) Driver of car , at an unsafe speed for those crowded conditions, drives bout a block before impact.
No doubt!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.