Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 3-Step Argument the Left Makes to Justify Violence Against Conservative Speakers
The Daily Signal ^ | 08/15/2017 | Ben Shapiro

Posted on 08/15/2017 5:50:53 PM PDT by ForYourChildren

Free speech is under assault because of a three-step argument made by the advocates and justifiers of violence.

The first step is they say that the validity or invalidity of an argument can be judged solely by the ethnic, sexual, racial, or cultural identity of the person making the argument.

The second step is that they claim those who say otherwise are engaging in what they call “verbal violence,” and the final step is they conclude that physical violence is sometimes justified in order to stop such verbal violence.

So let’s examine each of these three steps in turn. First, the philosophy of intersectionality. This philosophy now dominates college campuses as well as a large segment, unfortunately, of today’s Democratic Party and suggests that straight, white Americans are inherently the beneficiaries of white privilege and therefore cannot speak on certain policies, since they have not experienced what it’s like to be black or Hispanic or gay or transgender or a woman.

This philosophy ranks the value of a view, not based on the logic or merit of the view, but on the level of victimization in American society experienced by the person espousing the view. Therefore, if you’re an LGBT black woman, your view of American society is automatically more valuable than that of a straight, white male.

The next step in the logic is obvious. If a straight, white male, or anybody else who ranks lower on the victimhood scale, says something contrary to the viewpoint of the higher-ranking, intersectionality identity, that person has engaged in a microaggression.

As NYU social psychologist Jonathan Haidt writes, “Microaggressions are small actions or word choices that seem on their face to have no malicious intent, but that are thought of as a kind of violence nonetheless.”

You don’t have to actively say anything insulting to microaggress. Somebody merely needs to take offense. If, for example, you say that society ought to be colorblind, you’re microaggressing certain identity groups who have been victimized by a noncolorblind society.

Note: Microaggressions, as the name suggests, are not merely insults. They are aggressions. They are the equivalent of physical violence.

{..snip..}


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: antifa; intersectionality; jonathanhaidt; justification; leftists; liberalfascism; microaggressions; shapiro; theleft; violence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 08/15/2017 5:50:54 PM PDT by ForYourChildren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

See URL for complete article.

Very well done.


2 posted on 08/15/2017 5:51:14 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

1. the validity or invalidity of an argument can be judged solely by the ethnic, sexual, racial, or cultural identity of the person making the argument.

2. claim those who say otherwise are engaging in what they call “verbal violence,”

3. conclude that physical violence is sometimes justified in order to stop such verbal violence.


3 posted on 08/15/2017 5:52:03 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Note:

Microaggressions, as the name suggests, are not merely insults. They are aggressions. They are the equivalent of physical violence.


4 posted on 08/15/2017 5:52:23 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

This is both inane and dangerous. That’s because it leads to the final logical step: Words you don’t like deserve to be fought physically.


5 posted on 08/15/2017 5:52:52 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren
You don’t have to actively say anything insulting to micro aggress.

Just being white is enough, apparently.

6 posted on 08/15/2017 5:54:49 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Sounds just like Nazi Germany. No wonder Antifa was so angry in Virginia. They wanted to show the world they, Antifa, are the real Nazis and those skinheads were just fakes! I got it now, I understand! Antifa is the rebirth of Nazi Germany!


7 posted on 08/15/2017 5:55:52 PM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Yep.

Video evidence from Charlottesville: https://streamable.com/svxcr


8 posted on 08/15/2017 5:56:41 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Don't check the news, check Cernovich on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

“Hate speech” will be without protection within the next 30 years. I don’t doubt for a minute. It will probably tear the country apart.


9 posted on 08/15/2017 5:57:07 PM PDT by cornfedcowboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

that is not as far as it will go.

they will just attack you because you’re a white guy.

they do it now.


10 posted on 08/15/2017 5:57:57 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

xlnt


11 posted on 08/15/2017 5:59:27 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

bttt


12 posted on 08/15/2017 5:59:50 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (I was not elected to continue a failed system. I was elected to change it. --Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

Fanstastic link!

I’ll simply repeat your link below:

https://streamable.com/svxcr


13 posted on 08/15/2017 6:03:01 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Thanks! I think I found it on 8 Chan or The Donald.


14 posted on 08/15/2017 6:04:47 PM PDT by Bodleian_Girl (Don't check the news, check Cernovich on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bodleian_Girl

Offhand do u know the backup, new Twitter site for:

https://twitter.com/PolNewsForever

They warned they might get shut-down and had provided a backup but I was complacent and chose to believe Twitter would allow them to live a bit longer.

:(

Any ideas..?


15 posted on 08/15/2017 6:07:45 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

The first point shows that the Left is racist. More tolerant than thou hypocrites.


16 posted on 08/15/2017 6:11:24 PM PDT by liberalism is suicide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

Another step closer to CW-2...


17 posted on 08/15/2017 6:13:08 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. Mr Trump, we've got your six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren
Philosophy is great but I have a one-step response to anybody who initiates violence against me.
For any reason.


18 posted on 08/15/2017 6:13:10 PM PDT by TigersEye (0bama. The Legacy is a lie. The lie is the Legacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren
The first step is they say that the validity or invalidity of an argument can be judged solely by the ethnic, sexual, racial, or cultural identity of the person making the argument.

This first argument contains racialism -- mainly against straight white males -- along with the logical fallacy much loved by the left: the ad hominin argument. It is a logical fallacy instead of logic. Also, I don't think the two...propositions logically support the conclusion of violence against the right because they are not in syllogistic form; e.g.,
if Socrates is a man
and all men are mortal, therefore;
Socrates is mortal.

That woman got her head smashed in by a bike lock swung by a college professor(!) and gay man, Milo Yannopoulis, nearly got barbecued in Berkeley because of this nonsense. And those are just a few examples.

19 posted on 08/15/2017 6:22:10 PM PDT by Stepan12 (It is Civil War right now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Fear not. Timpangos and Sargon and me, we got this figured out. All us freepers are gonna be there the next time Antifa rears it’s ugly head and we are gonna give them the beat down they got coming. There oughta be about 20,000 of us next time around and we are making sure there won’t be any damn Nazis or White Nationalists. Gonna be nothing but freepers. Nothing but bona fide Constitutional Conservatives. In fact we are working on a screening form to make sure we aren’t infiltrated by any White Nationalists or pro abortion agosntic squishy economic conservatives or libertarian dope smokers. The Kinko’s bill is gonna be outrageous and we may have to set up a GoFundMe page to cover the expenses of making out the forms. But when we kick Antifa’s ass they are gonna know their ass has been kicked by 100% freeper Constitutional Conservatives. There won’t be any BSM microscopically giving all of us a background colonoscopy because we will already have done it and we won’t be called racist or misogynist or any of that crap. All 20,000 of us will be so thoroughly researched we won’t have to be ashamed to be there. I hear that there are literally millions of Black and Hispanic Constitutional Conservatives just waiting for us to get out of our Barcaloungers so we got them swelling our ranks.
I know all this to be true because I have been reading for days that all these freepers are out there just chomping at the bit to get out there and take care of business and they would, too, but there were Nazis and White Nationalists and they didn’t want to have nothing to do with them. Well, don’t worry. There are so many of you that I know we can rest assured that the next time Antifa surfaces we will send them back to the sewers they came from. I mean, I have been reading your posts and you all sound like there was just this one little thing holding you back. You aren’t afraid of getting acid squirted in your face or getting a skull fracture from a bike lock. But you don’t ever want to do anything that could give someone reason to think you might be racists.

Well don’t you worry. We’ll see you there. Today the Remote, Tomorrow the WORLD!


20 posted on 08/15/2017 6:24:30 PM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson