[DoodleDawg]

Really? Because it looks to me like one side had a permit and was exercising its constitutionally protected right to free speech, while the other side presented itself with the specific intent and purpose of denying the first side its constitutional rights by attacking them violently.

Both sides had permits. This is from an article in a local paper, the Charlottesville Daily Progress, from a day or two before the rally: "According to permits acquired from the city by University of Virginia professor Walt Heinecke, counter-protesters are expected to gather at the park and at nearby McGuffey Park and Justice Park, recently renamed from Jackson Park."

Link

[dsc]

“According to permits acquired from the city by University of Virginia professor Walt Heinecke”

That’s what the evilstream misleadia fake news outlet said. I’m reserving judgment.

[FreeReign]

Both sides had permits. This is from an article in a local paper, the Charlottesville Daily Progress, from a day or two before the rally: "According to permits acquired from the city by University of Virginia professor Walt Heinecke, counter-protesters are expected to gather at the park and at nearby McGuffey Park and Justice Park, recently renamed from Jackson Park."

I believe Heinecke had permits for McGuffey and Justice Park, but NOT Emancipation Park.