Posted on 08/11/2017 7:52:50 AM PDT by Mafe
OkayIm going to step back a second on the Electoral College. In general, I think the institution has served us well for over 200 years. No, I dont think that the five times a president was elected by winning the 270 electoral votes, but not the popular vote, constitutes a harbinger for the destruction of our republic. Liberals whine about Bushs 2000 win. They whine about Trumps 2016 win, albeit with more froth around the mouth. There were a solid couple of weeks worth of hot takes about how the Electoral College is archaic, racist, and anti-Democratic and yet were still here. Yet, theres an emerging consensus that while the Electoral College might have served us well, were approaching a point where the Democrats could run the table, and that swing states, in general, are dictating policy as a result of this system. Well get to that in a second.
In April, Townhall was invited to a seminar by the Institute for Research on Presidential Elections to a seminar about the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact and other reforms relating to the Electoral College, such as electors chosen by congressional district and proportional representation. I can already hear the groans. I had my reservations, but while Im still on the sidelines concerning taking a sidethe point about swing states being a catalyst for bad policy is compelling.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
We can’t have a popular vote winner with so many illegal votes being cast.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.