Posted on 08/11/2017 5:51:31 AM PDT by vannrox
All these rules go out the window when I remember back to 1968 and seeing some of the most sexy beautiful women hanging on to stinking hippies!
His AMERICAN MANHOOD magazines were aimed at the homos.
http://www.menspulpmags.com/2010/10/
“However, unlike most men’s pulp mags, which also featured ads for stag films, nude photos of female models and heterosexually-oriented books and sex aids, the only ads in American Manhood that had sex appeal were geared toward gay men, like these ads for male beefcake photos…”
I heard that if you work on your six pack long enough it turns into a keg ..
Well, as long as you can still see the tap you’re doing ok...
Reminds me of an old Playboy cartoon from fifty years ago.
A fat bald man is setting on a bar stool talking to a sweet young thing. He towers over and says...”I’m not really this tall. I’m setting on my wallet.”
She is very interested.
That’s not what Weider did.
He put out explicitly homosexual magazines.
Just for all interested, Joe’s wife, Betty Brosmer has her own website. She is an interesting personality in her own right.
http://www.bettyweider.com/bettyweider_info/Index.aspx
Well I for one still appreciate chivalry. Any time a man opens a door for me or similar gesture I make a point to look directly at them, smile and thank them!
Joe and his brother were businessmen. That’s my take.
Brother was Ben; I read their history, it’s a bit foggy now. It is impressive how they started up a business.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Weider
I love that. Saved it years ago ;-)
Now, for all you know, that guy has a great, sweet personality.
I googled it. True.
I don't tolerate guys who I see treating a lady like that in public. By God, I'll speak up and have him know he's being an ass.
b) Be RICH
c) Be well-endowed
After all, women care about what's on the INSIDE. /s
I read the entire article. There was nothing explicitly homosexual in the entire magazine. Many of the articles were explicitly heterosexual. It did offer collections of boby-builder photographs for sale—none of them naked. That was as gay it got.
I mean I could see why gays would buy the magazines, because they tend to be attracted to muscular men.
See post 77. I read a cover-to-cover description of one of these ‘gay,’ magazines. Unless photographs of weightlifters—clad—are explicitly homosexual, the magazine was not gay.
But the magazines were not openly or explicitly homosexual.
Suppose a movie like Ben Hur is popular with homosexual men. Does that make it gay?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.