Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theoria
A President follows out what Congress directs and authorizes him to do.

Congress declares war, provides an army, maintains a navy, provides for the common defense and prescribes Articles of War. But Congress is NOT the Commander-in-Chief. Only the President has the power of Commander in Chief, which includes absolute control over military strategy and the prosecution of war. It has always been intended as such as stated in Federalist 74:

"THE President of the United States is to be ``commander-in-chief of the army and navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several States when called into the actual service of the United States.'' The propriety of this provision is so evident in itself, and it is, at the same time, so consonant to the precedents of the State constitutions in general, that little need be said to explain or enforce it. Even those of them which have, in other respects, coupled the chief magistrate with a council, have for the most part concentrated the military authority in him alone. Of all the cares or concerns of government, the direction of war most peculiarly demands those qualities which distinguish the exercise of power by a single hand. The direction of war implies the direction of the common strength; and the power of directing and employing the common strength, forms a usual and essential part in the definition of the executive authority."

While Congress has the power to commence hostilities and to fund them, there is not and never has been Constitutional authority for Congress to "direct the president" in regard to conduct of military operations.

54 posted on 08/10/2017 8:52:55 PM PDT by henkster (Ask your favorite liberal to take the "Snowflake Challenge.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: henkster
'absolute control over military strategy and the prosecution of war.'

Yeah, at the declaration of War, that which is dictated by Congress. The President merely follows out the declaration and will of Congress. Congress and a state are the only delegated parties with the ability to get us into war.

The CiC doesn't mean much. The President doesn't set the rules and regulations of the military.

'there is not and never has been Constitutional authority for Congress to "direct the president" in regard to conduct of military operations.'

The President cannot conduct such military operations until Congress authorizes him to do it. Throw in letters of marque and general reprisal as well. We didn't even bring up the CiC.....when called into the actual service of the United States issue.

57 posted on 08/10/2017 9:28:13 PM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson