To: ptsal
That’s obstruction of justice.
He accessed classified information (her flight plan) to intimidate her.
She engaged in ethical violations by meeting him. Why did she take that risk? Obviously she was too intimidated to say “no.”
6 posted on
08/07/2017 4:08:05 PM PDT by
unlearner
(You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
To: unlearner
Obviously she was too intimidated to say “no.”
(((
Or too greedy....
24 posted on
08/07/2017 4:27:54 PM PDT by
Bigg Red
(Vacate the chair! Ryan must go.)
To: unlearner
He accessed classified information (her flight plan) to intimidate her.As sloppy as government IT is, no one "accesses" classified information, which is carried on separate encrypted systems. BJC did no access the information. It was divulged to him
To: unlearner
A thought: maybe there was a quid-pro-quo — If Lynch would forgo the investigation of her carelessness with the email server, Hillary (as president) would nominate Lynch for Supreme Court.
That ya go. What really happened.
63 posted on
08/07/2017 7:01:27 PM PDT by
dhs12345
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson