The loose ends don’t get tied up if Fuddy is actually dead. Fuddy knows who did what. She knows who needs to be silenced. Without that knowledge, a lot of surprises could show up. It only takes one person going rogue - like Edward Snowden - to screw up the whole thing.
Everybody on that plane knew there was no engine failure. Everybody in the water knew there were divers and equipment there. It was all planned in advance. In fact, somebody from the island had seen Fuddy that morning in Honolulu as they both awaited the flight to Kalaupapa and told Fuddy she should not take the flight back to Honolulu that afternoon - as if she knew there was an “accident” planned. I suspect that a LOT of people knew what was planned.
I don’t think that Fuddy would have agreed to a plot to kill her, and I don’t think that the other passengers would agree to take part in a plot to kill her.
I believe the whole thing was justified by the HI AG as necessary to PRESERVE her life. And it may well be that she offered to be fake-killed, knowing the other option was to be real-killed. To be real-killed would look fishy, whereas everybody would think this dramatic plane crash is too hard to be faked. So being fake-dead would benefit both Fuddy and the regime.
This way also allowed the family to know she was OK AND allowed their silence to be bought. Not only is there the “carrot” of financial gain, but there is also the “stick” that they could lose their “cover story indemnity” if they ever went back on their part of the agreement - and could end up actually paying for the fraud, perjury, and other crimes committed. That’s a good way to keep people silent - AND keep them from potentially suing if they knew that Fuddy really WAS dead.
Part of the thing with Montgomery, Petraeus, etc is a pattern that we need to understand: the deep state uses people who either are compromised already or who can be compromised. That’s what the NSA virus/trojan/ breaches/fingerprints are all about. They can plant whatever they have to plant in order to make a potential whistleblower “non-credible”, or to threaten being framed/charged/imprisoned if the potential whistleblower decides to blow the whistle.
I got a taste of that when “someone” responded to my post about the deep state’s ability to alter written history via altering/planting emails... by suggesting that child porn would be found on my husband’s computer. I was on vacation and desperately calling the church IT people to try to cauterize his computer so that nothing could be planted while we were gone.... That’s what these creeps do. They can make a “guilty” person out of ANYBODY. It’s what they tried to do to Sharyl Attkisson by planting classified records on her computer.
If a plan can automatically make the participants criminal, it means that they can be kept afraid to come forward. If Fuddy was really dead, her family would NOT have taken part in the hoax AND they would not have to fear coming forward about what happened. So the regime would have to deal with people who actually loved Fuddy and might not watch her be off-ed without giving a peep.
Remember, early on Louis Fuddy commented that the autopsy was fishy because his sister was not a weak-nerved person. To me that suggested that he - unlike Fuddy’s sister who took part in the hoax - did not know what had really happened. But after that he filed (and won out-of-court so that nobody could know who paid him what) a lawsuit against everybody but the pilot (who is the one who would be criminally liable if Fuddy was actually dead - and who in discovery might have balked at lying in a court of law...), and from then on he played the part the Obama regime wanted him to play...
I should add that those who knew something was up didn’t necessarily know all the details - whether she would actually die, be injured, by whisked away, or what.
And very, very few would know where she was whisked away to.
Once she had a new face and physique it could reach a point where she COULDN’T whistleblow, even if she wanted to, because there would not be a way to prove who she was.
Either Fuddy was cooperative or she wasn’t. If she wasn’t, she wouldn’t have agreed to give up the life she loved. If she was, she could have conveyed all her insider information in well under half an hour.
There is a string of dead bodies stretching out behind the Clintons a mile long. None of them would have agreed to be killed. But they’re all dead.
The simplest and most believable scenario is that Fuddy willingly conveyed her special information sometime prior to the crash. Then a simple ‘accident,’ happened, and she died.
What’s her family supposed to do? Deny that accidents happen? Seth Rich’s parents are not on the warpath against the Clintons. On the contrary, they disparage anyone who talks conspiracy re their son’s death.
For your theory to work, too many people would have to know about it. Only in theory do so many people cooperate perfectly. In reality, with a cast that big. Someone leaks. The absolute absence of leakers tells against your theory.
The simplest explanation is the most probable. In this case, the simplest explanation is that Fuddy died. I’m not going to belabor it. I know you won’t relinquish your theory. I personally don’t find it convincing. We’ll just have to agree to disagree.
I do admire all the work and research you’ve done. A lot of what you discovered is quality info. I hope you and your family stay safe and healthy. Thanks for the post also. Appreciate your input.